You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Development, Verification, and Implementation of a National Full Consensus Fracture Toughness Test Method Standard for Advanced Ceramics

    Published: 0

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (584K) 27 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (5.1M) 227 $116   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    The dawn of a new age in understanding fracture of brittle material occurred in 1999 (eight years after an ASTM task group on fracture toughness of advanced ceramics was formed) when a national full consensus fracture toughness test method standard was approved as ASTM Test Methods for the Determination of Fracture Toughness of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature (C 1421 ). C 1421 uses common flexure test specimen geometries (typically 3 × 4 × 50 mm) in conjunction with three and fourpoint flexure test configurations. Three different types of notch/crack geometries are employed: single edge precracked beam (SEPB); surface crack in flexure (SCF); and chevron-notched beam (CNB). Extensive experimental, analytical, and numerical evaluations were conducted prior to and during the approval of the standard. Several round robins (e.g., VAMAS) verified and validated the choice of dimensions and test parameters. Two concurrent post-approval implementations of the standard are cited: i) fracture tests of a single composition of an advanced ceramic led to the introduction of a standard reference material (SRM) for fracture toughness and ii) fracture tests on two different compositions of a ceramic system showed the statistically significantly greater fracture toughness of one material for a wear application.


    advanced ceramic, fracture toughness, chevron notched beam (CNB), single edge precracked beam (SEPB), surface crack in flexure (SCF)

    Author Information:

    Jenkins, MG
    Professor and Associate Chair for Academics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

    Salem, JA
    NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH

    Quinn, GD
    Research Scientist, National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    Bar-On, I
    Professor, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA

    Committee/Subcommittee: C28.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP10471S