Journal Published Online: 13 November 2017
Volume 46, Issue 3

Comparison Between Destructive and Nondestructive Tests in the Evaluation of Abrasion Resistance of Concrete

CODEN: JTEVAB

Abstract

Constant loading and transportation of materials cause abrasive wear in industrial floors. This study compared destructive and nondestructive testing techniques to evaluate the abrasion resistance of concrete. Eight concrete hardeners (six solid and two liquid) were subjected to abrasion, ultrasound, and rebound hammer tests. The results of the trials were compared to identify the concrete hardeners that provide more abrasion strength, and also to determine the relationships between the tests. The results indicated that solid hardeners provide more abrasion resistance than liquid ones and that the abrasion, as a destructive test, and the rebound hammer, as a nondestructive test, show similar results.

Author Information

Meza, A.
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Inst. Technology of Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México
Ortiz, J. A.
Dept. of Construction and Structures, Autonomous Univ. of Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México
Peralta, L.
Builder Group PEASA, S.A. de C.V., Aguascalientes, México
Sánchez, C.
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Inst. Technology of Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, México
Pages: 7
Price: $25.00
Related
Reprints and Permissions
Reprints and copyright permissions can be requested through the
Copyright Clearance Center
Details
Stock #: JTE20160159
ISSN: 0090-3973
DOI: 10.1520/JTE20160159