You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 44, Issue 3 (May 2016)

    Rolling Contact Fatigue Tests of Ceramics by Various Methods: Comparison of Suitability to the Evaluation of Silicon Nitrides

    (Received 11 June 2014; accepted 30 October 2014)

    Published Online: 2016

    CODEN: JTEVAB

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (3.3M) 13 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    Results of rolling contact fatigue (RCF) tests by balls-on-rod (BOR) and two-roller methods have been compared to those by the balls-on-flat (BOF) method by using three different silicon nitride grades. Two were bearing grade (BG) and one was a general purpose (GP) grade. For a GP material, there was not much difference between the results of BOR and those of BOF, and the observations of a spalled region by BOR suggested similar spalling behavior to BOF. Meanwhile, for BG materials, most tests were terminated without spalling, but grooves, whose likely cause is inferred to be insufficient lubrication, were formed. As for the lifetime in BOR, however, the results for BG materials were much longer than those of the GP, demonstrating that the BOR result is qualitatively consistent with that of BOF, where instead most specimens failed in RCF by spalling or peeling. In the two-roller method, tests of a limited number of specimens were operated at high slip ratios of 10 % during longer cycles under low contact stress, and wear was predominant, suggesting the potential of providing the information on wear behavior rather than RCF. The results suggest that the two-roller method could differentiate the BG materials in terms of wear behavior. Considering these results, both the BOF and the BOR are applicable to distinguish BG and GP materials in terms of fatigue resistance. In particular, the BOF is judged to be more suitable for comparison of the RCF behavior of BG materials, which are commonly tested under higher contact stresses.


    Author Information:

    Kanematsu, Wataru
    National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Nagoya,

    Mandler, William
    Toshiba America Electronic Components, Marlborough, MA

    Manier, Charles-Alix
    Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin,

    Currently at Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration, Berlin,

    Woydt, Mathias
    Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Berlin,


    Stock #: JTE20140258

    ISSN:0090-3973

    DOI: 10.1520/JTE20140258

    Author
    Title Rolling Contact Fatigue Tests of Ceramics by Various Methods: Comparison of Suitability to the Evaluation of Silicon Nitrides
    Symposium ,
    Committee F34