You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    Volume 18, Issue 3 (May 1990)

    Estimation of Characteristic Values of Fracture Toughness

    (Received 1 May 1989; accepted 8 November 1989)

    Published Online: 01 May 1990


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (424K) 19 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    It is desirable in design codes to characterize material strength by a low fractile of its distribution. This low fractile is known as a characteristic value. The material strength variable considered here is fracture toughness.

    Ten realistic fracture toughness distributions were defined, and two characteristic values were estimated on the basis of simulated observations from these parent distributions. The estimates were then compared with the actual characteristic values to evaluate the quality of the estimators. Three estimators were evaluated: one estimator was based on the assumption that the parent distribution was log-normal; the second estimator assumed that it was a two-parameter Weibull distribution with a shape parameter equal to two; and the third was a power limit estimator, which assumed little about the parent distribution's parametric form.

    The results suggest that in practical situations the log-normal method gives the best estimator, and that ten is a reasonable number of fracture toughness tests for the purposes of characteristic value estimation by the log-normal method.

    Author Information:

    Slatcher, S
    The Welding Institute, Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge,

    Stock #: JTE12468J


    DOI: 10.1520/JTE12468J

    Title Estimation of Characteristic Values of Fracture Toughness
    Symposium ,
    Committee E08