You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    Volume 7, Issue 2 (June 2018)

    Special Issue Paper

    Crack Size and Shape Considerations Related to Near-Threshold Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior

    (Received 12 July 2017; accepted 17 January 2018)

    Published Online: 04 June 2018

    CODEN: MPCACD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (1.85 MB) 12 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    It is well recognized that crack size or load history or both have an important influence on near-threshold fatigue crack rate behavior at a low stress ratio. This investigation will compare the behavior of a radial crack, such as a surface flaw or a corner crack, to that of a linear crack to see if crack shape plays a role in physically small crack to long crack behavior. Recent research has unveiled a methodology to experimentally partition plasticity from roughness- and oxide-induced crack closure, showing that nonplasticity-induced closure mechanisms have a greater influence at low Kmax by orders of magnitude. Knowledge of this is key to understanding differences between long crack and physically small crack behavior in the near-threshold regime. In this study, the well behaved 2024-T351 aluminum alloy was used to generate threshold data using numerous specimen geometries, flaw geometries, crack sizes, and test procedures to highlight not only the significance of crack size but also the role of crack shape. It will be shown both experimentally and analytically that a radial crack (surface flaw, corner crack) has significantly less remote closure and, therefore, a lower threshold than a through crack (compact tension, middle crack tension), even if the crack size is the same.

    Author Information:

    Donald, J. Keith
    Fracture Technology Associates, Bethlehem, PA

    James, Mark A.
    Arconic Technology Center, New Kensington, PA

    Pettit, Richard G.
    FractureLab LLC, Fruit Heights, UT


    Stock #: MPC20170094

    ISSN:2379-1365

    DOI: 10.1520/MPC20170094

    Author
    Title Crack Size and Shape Considerations Related to Near-Threshold Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Behavior
    Symposium ,
    Committee E08