You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    Volume 7, Issue 4 (May 2018)

    Special Issue Paper

    Repeatability of Contour Method Residual Stress Measurements for a Range of Materials, Processes, and Geometries

    (Received 7 April 2017; accepted 11 September 2017)

    Published Online: 08 May 2018

    CODEN: MPCACD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (10.09 MB) 19 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    This article examines the precision of the contour method using five residual stress measurement repeatability studies. The test specimens evaluated include the following: an aluminum T-section, a stainless steel plate with a dissimilar metal slot-filled weld, a stainless steel forging, a titanium plate with an electron beam slot-filled weld, and a nickel disk forging. These specimens were selected to encompass a range of typical materials and residual stress distributions. Each repeatability study included contour method measurements on five to ten similar specimens. Following completion of the residual stress measurements, an analysis was performed to determine the repeatability standard deviation of each population. In general, the results of the various repeatability studies are similar. The repeatability standard deviation tends to be relatively small throughout the part interior, and there are localized regions of higher repeatability standard deviations along the part perimeter. The repeatability standard deviations over much of the cross section range from 5 MPa for the aluminum T-section to 25 MPa for the nickel disk forging. There is a strong correlation between the elastic modulus of the material and the repeatability standard deviation. These results demonstrate the precision of the contour method over a broad range of specimen geometries, materials, and stress states.

    Author Information:

    Olson, Mitchell D.
    Hill Engineering, LLC, Rancho Cordova, CA

    DeWald, Adrian T.
    Hill Engineering, LLC, Rancho Cordova, CA

    Hill, Michael R.
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA


    Stock #: MPC20170044

    ISSN:2379-1365

    DOI: 10.1520/MPC20170044

    Author
    Title Repeatability of Contour Method Residual Stress Measurements for a Range of Materials, Processes, and Geometries
    Symposium ,
    Committee E08