You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    Volume 5, Issue 5 (December 2016)

    Special Issue Paper

    Results of Interlaboratory Test Programs to Assess the Precision of Inclusion Ratings by Methods A, C, and D of ASTM E45

    (Received 14 January 2016; accepted 25 April 2016)

    Published Online: 22 December 2016

    CODEN: MPCACD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (168K) 11 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    Over the years, ASTM Committee E4 on metallography has conducted interlaboratory test programs to evaluate the precision and bias associated with measurements of microstructure using proposed and existing test methods. ASTM decided in the late 1970s that all test methods that generated numerical data must have a precision and bias section defining the repeatability and reproducibility of the method. Defining bias associated with a test method is difficult unless there is an absolute known value for the quantity being measured and this is not possible when microstructural features are being measured. This paper shows the results for an interlaboratory test using Method A, “worst-field” ratings of inclusions in steels using the original Plates I and III of ASTM E45, using Method C, a worst-field rating using Plate II; and, using Method D, a quantitative approach where every field is rated using Plates I and III. The results from nine people who were reported to be qualified, regular users of the method revealed consistent problems of misclassification of inclusion types and a wide range of severity ratings for each specimen. The test results using an image analyzer will be compared to that of the manual raters.


    Author Information:

    Vander Voort, G. F.
    Struers Inc., Westlake, OH


    Stock #: MPC20160002

    ISSN:2165-3992

    DOI: 10.1520/MPC20160002

    Author
    Title Results of Interlaboratory Test Programs to Assess the Precision of Inclusion Ratings by Methods A, C, and D of ASTM E45
    Symposium ,
    Committee E04