You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 3, Issue 7 (July 2006)

    Disposal of Dredged Material in a Local Confined Disposal Facility: Budgeting and Accounting of Contaminant Transport

    (Received 19 April 2005; accepted 28 September 2005)


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (336K) 13 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Disposal of contaminated dredged material in local confined disposal facilities (CDF) has the advantages of reduced costs and reduced need for transport of the dredged material compared to many other disposal alternatives. CDFs can often be combined with land reclamation which can add considerable value to a dredging project. A local CDF has been constructed for Hg and HCB contaminated dredged material on a contaminated seabed close to one of Norway's largest industrial areas, Herøya. The construction has been completed with permeable barriers allowing transport of water from dewatering of dredged material and consolidation of sediment below the CDF. However, this design will also allow some transport of contaminants with the released pore water. The efficiency of the CDF was evaluated by making a budget of estimated contaminant emission from the disposal area before, during, and after construction and filling of the CDF. Laboratory tests and an analytical model were utilized for calculation of advective and diffusive transport of contaminants both from the dredged material and from the original contaminated seabed sediment at the disposal site. Our estimation of contaminant transport predicted that the leakage of contaminants from dredged material in the disposal facility would be orders of magnitude less than what was released from the seabed sediments at the disposal site before the realization of the CDF. Monitoring of contaminant transport, after realization of the CDF, has so far shown that the actual transport is much lower than the conservative estimate presented in our budget of contaminant transport. These results show that there can be a large and positive cost benefit from disposal of dredged material in CDFs constructed with permeable barriers in already contaminated areas. Sensitivity of calculated remediation efficiency to uncertainties in the estimated transport was found to be small in the case presented here. Our results also show that budgeting and accounting of contaminant transport can be a powerful tool both for impact assessments before realization of a project in contaminated sediments and for interpretation of monitoring data during and after the realization. Budgeting of contaminant transport also helps identifying the most critical transport mechanisms during the different phases of the project.

    Author Information:

    Eek, E
    Project Engineer, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo,

    Pettersen, A
    Project Engineer, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo,

    Hauge, A
    Division Director Environmental Engineering, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo,

    Breedveld, GD
    Deputy Division Director, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo,

    Solberg, A
    Technical Director, Herøya Industrial Park, Porsgrunn,

    Heines, SU
    Technical Director, Grenland Harbour Authority, Porsgrunn,

    Solberg, K
    Survey Engineer, Geotek AS, Porsgrunn,

    Lie, SO
    HES-manager, Herøya Industrial Park, Porsgrunn,

    Stock #: JAI13317


    DOI: 10.1520/JAI13317

    Title Disposal of Dredged Material in a Local Confined Disposal Facility: Budgeting and Accounting of Contaminant Transport
    Symposium ,
    Committee D18