You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    If you are an ASTM Compass Subscriber and this document is part of your subscription, you can access it for free at ASTM Compass
    Volume 9, Issue 4 (April 2012)

    Easiest Routes and Slow Zones: How Fast Do I Go?: Speeds and Distances of Recreational and Expert Snowsport Participants

    (Received 18 May 2011; accepted 14 December 2011)

    Published Online: 01 April 2012


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (600K) 9 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    High speeds in snowsports have been associated with both the affective appeal as well as the risk of injury. Previous research of speeds of snowsport participants have been recorded on limited terrain or a single run using static radar guns or speed cameras. However, from a resort design and management perspective, more information is needed about areas of potential risk where there are a variety of users, skill levels, and speed. This exploratory research seeks to understand the actual and perceived distance and speeds traveled by a variety of snowsport participants over their day’s participation as well in resort-designated “slow zones.” A convenience sample of expert and recreational participants was recruited in a Western Canadian resort during the 2010–2011 season. A GPS-based data-logging device recorded speed, distance, duration, and location. Participants completed a questionnaire covering demographics, perceptions of maximum speed and distance traveled, and recommended speeds in slow zones. Data was collected over 102 sessions for alpine skiers, snowboarders, and telemarkers who traveled >4.5 km during their data-collection period: age range 9–80 years ( = 42.0), 39.8 % females and 67.6 % advanced/expert. Total skiing/boarding time logged was 497 h (17 min–7 h, 38 min, = 4 h, 52 min) covering 4475 km ( = 43.87 km). Estimates of distance traveled was 3–100 km ( = 33.70 km, SD = 21.98 km). Maximum speeds recorded were 20.2–108.5 km/h ( = 62.06 km/h); all but two recorded maximum speeds >23 km/h. Estimated maximum speeds ranged from 1–100 km/h ( = 50.82 km/h). A paired sample t-test of estimated and actual maximum speeds was significant (p = .000). Participants’ recommendation for speeds in slow zones ranged from 5 to 60 km/h ( = 23.8 km/h, mode = 30 km/h). Participants were generally unaware of the distances they traveled and the maximum speeds achieved, with most traveling in slow zones at speeds greater than their own recommendations.

    Author Information:

    Dickson, Tracey J.
    Associate Professor, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, Univ. of Canberra, Canberra,

    Terwiel, F. Anne
    Faculty of Adventure, Culinary Arts and Tourism, Thompson Rivers Univ., Kamloops, BC

    Waddington, Gordon S.
    Professor, Faculty of Health, Univ. of Canberra, Canberra,

    Trathen, Stephen D.
    Faculty of Arts and Design, Univ. of Canberra, Canberra,

    Stock #: JAI104490


    DOI: 10.1520/JAI104490

    Title Easiest Routes and Slow Zones: How Fast Do I Go?: Speeds and Distances of Recreational and Expert Snowsport Participants
    Symposium ,
    Committee F27