(Received 18 April 2009; accepted 26 October 2009)
Published Online: 2010
| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|PDF (212K)||9||$25||  ADD TO CART|
Cite this document
Air-void analysis of hardened concrete is typically performed according to ASTM C457–09 [“Standard Test Method for Microscopical Determination of Parameters of Air-Void System in Hardened Concrete,“ Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 4.2, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA], which can be tedious to perform and is operator subjective. Several alternative automated methods have been proposed, two of which are the Rapid Air 457 and the scanner method developed at Michigan Technological University. In each of these methods, images are collected from contrast enhanced surfaces of polished concrete, and image analysis is performed to calculate air-void system parameters. In this research, 22 concrete samples were examined using these two methods, the air-void system parameters were compared to those obtained from the ASTM C457 standard, and the precision of the results was compared to the recommendations of ASTM standard. It was concluded that the total air content and the spacing factor of the air voids measured by Rapid Air 457 and the scanner method were comparable to the air content and the spacing factor measured according to the standard manual method. Considering the fact that the automated image systems could detect air voids smaller in diameter than those typically seen by an operator, it was found that if these small air voids are counted, calculated spacing factors are smaller than those calculated by the manual method. If small diameter air voids are removed from the analysis, then spacing factors agree fairly well with those calculated by ASTM C457 from stereo-optical microscopy.
Ramezanianpour, A. M.
Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Hooton, R. D.
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON
Stock #: JAI102476