You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 6, Issue 3 (March 2009)

    Experimental Studies on Coupled Treatment of Chromite Ore Processing Residue

    (Received 1 November 2008; accepted 13 January 2009)

    Published Online: 19 February 2009


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (204K) 10 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    A study was performed to investigate the combined treatment of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) and heaving in Chromite Ore Processing Residue (COPR). Treatment of heaving focused on the intentional exhaustion of the mineral brownmillerite, the hydration of which is considered responsible for volume expansion in COPR deposition sites in New Jersey. The addition of sufficient amounts of sulfate under different conditions of temperature, acidity, and particle size aimed in the quick transformation of brownmillerite to ettringite, a phenomenon observed during a COPR pilot scale study. Simultaneously, the reductive treatment of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) in COPR was pursued using calcium polysulfide (CPS) and ferrous sulfate (FS). X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectroscopy (XANES) analyses showed that neither reductant was able to reduce Cr(VI) below 1,000 mg/kg after three months (FS) and six months (CPS) of treatment. However, competitive sulfide oxidation by oxygen was much slower compared to ferrous iron oxidation, as evidenced by chemical analyses. Quantitative X-ray diffraction analyses showed that brownmillerite dissolved to form ettringite only in a sample treated with FS at 50°C; neither acidity or temperature alone were able to trigger brownmillerite dissolution and ettringite formation. Particle size reduction to <150 μm had also no apparent effect in the rate of brownmillerite dissolution. Thus, CPS is deemed a more appropriate reductant for Cr(VI) treatment, while the exhaustion of brownmillerite appears to be a challenging engineering task.

    Author Information:

    Chrysochoou, Maria
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

    Dermatas, Dimitris
    Waste Management Authority Eastern Macedonia-Thrace, Komotini,

    Christodoulatos, Christos
    Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ

    Stock #: JAI102165


    DOI: 10.1520/JAI102165

    Title Experimental Studies on Coupled Treatment of Chromite Ore Processing Residue
    Symposium ,
    Committee D34