You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 40, Issue 6 (November 2017)

    Development of Strength Models for Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement/Byproduct Material Improved Soils

    (Received 20 June 2016; accepted 24 March 2017)

    Published Online: 10 November 2017

    CODEN: GTJODJ

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (1.22 MB) 8 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    This paper presents the possible inclusion of pulverized fuel ash (PFA) and ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) in cement deep soil mixing for enhancement of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of weak soil materials for construction purposes. The main focus of this paper was to investigate the UCS of cement-, cement/PFA- and cement/PFA/GGBS-improved soils, and development of mathematical and graphical models for prediction of UCS for use in design and construction. Samples of cement, blends of cement and PFA, and cement/PFA/GGBS were prepared using 5 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 % by weight of dry soil and tested for UCS after 7, 14, 28, and 56 days. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using the SPSS computer program. The results showed that soil materials with lower plasticity show higher strength development compared to those of higher plasticity for cement improvement. The study has also revealed that the inclusion of PFA and GGBS can cause a reduction in the amount of cement in deep soil mixing, which can result to reduced cost and emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) during construction. The developed mathematical and graphical models could give reliable predictions of UCS for weak soil materials with initial UCS less than or equal to 25 kPa and for water to binder ratio of unity based on the observed agreement between experimental and predicted data. The developed multiple regression models have also been validated using different mixtures of 6 %, 8 %, 12 %, and 16 % of binders.

    Author Information:

    Abbey, S. J.
    School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University,

    Ngambi, S.
    School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University,

    Ganjian, E.
    School of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University,


    Stock #: GTJ20160138

    ISSN:0149-6115

    DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20160138

    Author
    Title Development of Strength Models for Prediction of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cement/Byproduct Material Improved Soils
    Symposium ,
    Committee C01