You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 32, Issue 2 (March 2009)

    Interpreting Slug Tests with Large Data Sets

    (Received 15 February 2007; accepted 25 November 2008)

    Published Online: 01 March 2009


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (492K) 8 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Pressure transducers are frequently used to monitor slug tests, and to collect a data set for height Z of water column versus time t. Direct application of the data to draw a velocity graph usually produces a wide scatter, thus limiting the usefulness of the velocity graph method. This paper proposes to interpret the data set in five steps. First, a Z(t) plot is drawn to assess the uncertainty in the Z data. Second, a limited number of data points are selected to reduce the uncertainty to about ±10 % in the velocity graph. Third, the velocity graph is drawn to obtain the hydraulic conductivity k and the piezometric error H0, if any, giving the piezometric level for the test. Fourth, the graph of ln(ZH0) versus t is drawn to verify its linearity and check the k value of the velocity graph. Fifth, the graph of Z versus log10(t) can be used in a curve fitting process to yield directly both H0 and k, thus providing a second method to interpret the data set, which may be the only one possible when the Z(t) data are inaccurate. Examples are provided to illustrate the five steps and common problems.

    Author Information:

    Chapuis, Robert P.
    École Polytechnique de Montréal,

    Stock #: GTJ101058


    DOI: 10.1520/GTJ101058

    Title Interpreting Slug Tests with Large Data Sets
    Symposium ,
    Committee D18