Published Online: 2003
| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|PDF (12K)||1||$25||  ADD TO CART|
Cite this document
I read with alarm the discussion by Thompson et al., of the significance of DNA evidence in forensic casework. I was struck by the authors' description of a 1995 case in the jurisdiction in which I practice law. The authors state: "In 1995, Cellmark Diagnostics admitted that a similar sample-switch error had caused it to report, incorrectly, that a rape defendant's DNA profile matched DNA found in vaginal aspirate from a rape victim."
Stock #: JFS2003059