You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 48, Issue 4 (July 2003)

    Volitional Impairment and the Sexually Violent Predator

    (Received 2 March 2002; accepted 2 December 2002)

    Published Online: July


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 8 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    This article discusses psychiatry's limited conceptualization of volitional capacity and its application to sexually violent predator laws by exploring two legal opinions critical to predator case law (Kansas v. Hendricks and Kansas v. Crane). The author reviewed pertinent psychiatric literature on impaired volition to identify potential contributions and limitations that psychiatry may offer the legal field. Assessment of the ego dystonic nature of impaired self-regulation, utilization of recent advances in self-assessment and laboratory evaluation of impulsive behavior, and dimensional categorization of a volitional capacity construct are recommended as an approach to the assessment and understanding of an inability to control concept. This paper concludes that elements of volition may be psychiatrically evaluated in a way that contributes to the Court's understanding of that capacity. However, further study is needed to operationally define volitional capacity and address issues of assessment validity and reliability.

    Stock #: JFS2002087

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS2002087

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Title Volitional Impairment and the Sexually Violent Predator
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30