You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 47, Issue 4 (July 2002)

    The Use of Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence (QLF) to Identify Composite Restorations in Forensic Examinations

    (Received 29 December 2002; accepted 29 December 2001)

    Published Online: July


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 6 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    There has been a large increase in the number of tooth colored restorations "white fillings" placed in recent years. An increased de-mand from the public for more aesthetic dental restorations causes a potential problem for forensic dentists who may find the fillings difficult to identify and hence include in postmortem odontograms. This has implications for the accuracy of dental identifications, particularly in situations where limited time is available for postmortem identification, e.g., mass casualty incidents. A new method for the detection of composite restora-tions is presented. Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence (QLF) is a technique currently employed to detect small changes in enamel mineral con-tent. An experiment was conducted to determine if the technique would afford a greater degree of contrast between composite and enamel and thus enable the accuracy of composite identification in enamel. Twenty-four previously extracted human premolars were gently cleaned with pumice and wet-and-dry paper. Twelve were subsequently randomly selected and restored on their buccal surfaces with Spectrum (a composite) following man-ufacturer's instructions. No attempt was made to color match the teeth and all were filled with shade B3. Twelve teeth were left unrestored. QLF and normal white light images were taken of both restored and non-restored surfaces with teeth wet and then dried. Ten forensic dentists were asked on two separate occasions (one month between each attempt) to indicate whether or not they thought the surface was: a) restored or b) unrestored. Results indicate that forensic dentists detected a significantly higher proportion ( p1/4neo0.005) of filled surfaces with QLF.

    Author Information:

    Pretty, IA
    Doctoral student, The University of Liverpool,

    Smith, PW
    Lecturer, Honorary consultant, Unit of Prosthodontics, University Dental Hospital of Manchester,

    Higham, SM
    Senior lecturer, The University of Liverpool,

    Edgar, WM
    Emeritus professor, Senior Research Fellow, The University of Liverpool,

    Stock #: JFS15468J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS15468J

    Title The Use of Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence (QLF) to Identify Composite Restorations in Forensic Examinations
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30