(Received 18 June 1998; accepted 8 March 1999)
| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|PDF (296K)||15||$25||  ADD TO CART|
Cite this document
Several criteria are proposed for making decisions about comparing sets of debris involving the transfer of non-component particles and fibers—those produced from something other than the item itself—using a model based upon rudimentary set theory. Decisions about the significance of an association or an exclusion based upon trace evidence require an evaluation of debris in its context; reference points for such evaluation are presented. Samples of debris from the sites relevant to the event under investigation must be available, as well as debris standards from the usual environments of the people involved, and must be adequate to permit a determination of normal versus foreign debris.
Criteria are proposed for establishing contact based upon corresponding sets of particles and fibers, for excluding contact in the absence of corresponding particles or fibers, and for refraining from making either an association or an exclusion. Conditions for reaching qualified conclusions or other types of associations when these criteria are only partially met are also discussed; conclusions may sometimes be reached if potential sources for debris particles and fibers can be found. Decisions about the strength of an association or an exclusion based upon comparisons of non-component debris particles and fibers can be made by reference to the criteria for reaching a conclusion. The criteria can be tested via Bayes' Theorem. The analysis itself is based primarily upon light microscopy, although other methods may be used as well. Case examples are presented.
Cwiklik & Associates: Microscopy and Forensic Consulting, Seattle, WA
Stock #: JFS14583J