Journal Published Online: 01 January 1995
Volume 40, Issue 1

Determinations of Dangerousness in Forensic Patients: An Archival Study

CODEN: JFSCAS

Abstract

The involvement of mental health professionals in determinations of dangerousness is both common and controversial. Among the various contexts for these evaluations, the release of potentially violent forensic patients from maximum security facilities evokes justified concern from involved experts and apprehension to outrage from the immediate community. We sought to examine how conclusions are reached on dangerousness at two sequential stages: clinical recommendations and Manifest Dangerousness Hearings decisions. In an archival study of 245 patients, we found that lack of progress in the institution and physical assaultiveness were the strongest correlates with dangerousness. In contrast, experts and review boards appeared to be relatively less influenced by diagnosis, types of treatment, and sociodemographic variables.

Author Information

Rogers, R
University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Sewell, KW
University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Ross, M
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Vernon State Hospital, Vernon, TX
Ustad, K
University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Williams, A
University of North Texas, Denton, TX
Pages: 4
Price: $25.00
Related
Reprints and Permissions
Reprints and copyright permissions can be requested through the
Copyright Clearance Center
Details
Stock #: JFS13763J
ISSN: 0022-1198
DOI: 10.1520/JFS13763J