You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 31, Issue 1 (January 1986)

    Pathological Gambling and Criminal Responsibility

    (Received 8 February 1985; accepted 1 April 1985)


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (324K) 6 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    There exists significant interdisciplinary support for eliminating the volitional component of the insanity defense. Somewhat in contrast to this trend is the presentation of pathological gambling as a potentially exculpatory condition in criminal trials. The authors discuss three federal appellate court decisions on this attempted inappropriate usage of psychiatric diagnostic nomenclature. All have upheld convictions, and thereby rejected contentions that such an impulse disorder can form the basis for a valid plea of lack of criminal responsibility. It is suggested that the public interest will be served by statutorily making disturbances of behavioral control insufficient to raise a defense of insanity.

    Author Information:

    Halpern, AL
    Chairman, United Hospital, Port Chester, NY

    Portnow, SL
    Attending psychiatrist, Bellevue Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY

    Rachlin, S
    Chairman, Nassau County Medical Center, East Meadow, NY

    Stock #: JFS11876J


    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11876J

    Title Pathological Gambling and Criminal Responsibility
    Symposium ,
    Committee E30