You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 28, Issue 2 (April 1983)

    General Discussion

    (Received 2 August 1982; accepted 9 August 1982)

    Published Online: 1983


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (348K) 3 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    (by Moderator) The opening of discussion (by Godfrey Isaac, Esq.) stressed the advantage of practical court experience in the application of behavioral art and sciences to forensic science cases. Among factors emphasized were (a) the need for “being oneself,” that is, expressing the individual personality rather than trying to adjust to an assumed form of wardrobe, speech, and so forth; (b) one's psychological preparation, “being ready,” the homework done well; and (c) adopt an individual style, “being in touch.” do your own thing. At the same time other panel members (Drs. Tom Miller and Ken Sereno) countered that effective communication is not an inherent natural behavior, that is, people are not born effective speakers. Hence, it pays off to take training in order to be a “better witness,” that is. a more effective self. Participants from the audience commented that they had enjoyed these “unique presentations” (Dr. Gerald Vale), had learned a lot, and were “very much impressed” (Dr. Emanuel Tanay).

    Author Information:

    Isaac, G
    Chairman, American Academy of Forensic Sciences,

    Sognnaes, RF
    Moderator of discussion; Professor and Dean Emeritus of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles,

    Stock #: JFS11543J


    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11543J

    Title General Discussion
    Symposium ,
    Committee E30