You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 28, Issue 2 (April 1983)

    Nature of Jury Response to the Expert Witness

    (Received 2 August 1982; accepted 9 August 1982)

    Published Online: April


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 4 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Communications to jurors entail not only primary content—the subject matter of the testimony—designated as the message, but also secondary content emanating from the witnesses as sources, from peripheral aspects of the message itself, and from the environment of the trial—designated as the paramessage. Interviews with jurors after a trial involving extensive expert testimony to introduce a new technology for identification evidence, popularly referred to as “voiceprinting,” found they responded mainly to the paramessage. The general implication is that when confronted with complex or confusing testimony, expert or otherwise, jurors will shift their focus to observable characteristics of the sources of the information, or to other ancillary elements of the situation, and will be guided in their response by information and inferences derived from such data.

    Author Information:

    Rosenthal, P
    Chairman of Communications Studies Program, University of California, Los Angeles,

    Stock #: JFS11541J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11541J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Title Nature of Jury Response to the Expert Witness
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30