You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 30, Issue 1 (January 1985)

    Medical Diagnosis Versus Legal Determination of Death

    (Received 5 March 1984; accepted 1 May 1984)

    Published Online: 1985


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (356K) 8 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    This summary of the medical and legal descriptions of death notes that the physician makes a medical diagnosis of death, the physician then makes the legal pronouncement of death, and that statute or the courts make the legal determination of death. Medical diagnosis of death follows either the common law standard of total cessation of cardiac and respiratory function or the medically accepted standards of brain death, the latter being based on irreversible loss of brain function. Cessation of cardiorespiratory function inevitably causes brain death; similarly, brain death inevitably causes cessation of cardiac function. The common law definition of death has been redefined: death is brain death which inevitably causes cessation of the cardiorespiratory functions. Legal determination of death, since the advent of cadaver organ transplantation, has been made by case law, which is briefly summarized, or by statute in most jurisdictions. The history of the Uniform Determination of Death Act is briefly summarized; this observer joins those recommending adoption of this Act. A table gives the rules or statutes that determine death in 36 U.S. jurisdictions.

    Author Information:

    Gorman, WF
    Visiting lecturer, formerly visiting professor, College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe,

    Stock #: JFS10975J


    DOI: 10.1520/JFS10975J

    Title Medical Diagnosis Versus Legal Determination of Death
    Symposium ,
    Committee E30