You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 21, Issue 4 (October 1976)

    The Expert Witness: A Dilemma

    (Received 15 October 1975; accepted 5 January 1976)

    Published Online: 1976


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (380K) 5 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word


    Witnesses in courts of law may generally be divided into “fact” witnesses and expert witnesses. The law relative to fact witnesses for the most part is well defined, but the law relative to expert witnesses differs considerably in the various jurisdictions. An expert witness in litigation is very often a physician by training. Even though most situations involve a physican as the expert witness, the basic questions of law to be explored will concern other professionals who, by the nature of their training, possess special knowledge. Engineers, attorneys, accountants, judges, and psychiatrists are examples. Conceivably, it could be applicable to nonprofessionals who by virtue of experience or occupation possess a specialized knowledge which could serve as the basis for an expert opinion.

    Author Information:

    Byrd, GJ
    Assistant professor of psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

    Stults, T
    Attorney-at-law, Houston, Tex.

    Stock #: JFS10580J


    DOI: 10.1520/JFS10580J

    Title The Expert Witness: A Dilemma
    Symposium ,
    Committee E30