| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|7||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||7||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
This practice is applicable for qualitatively evaluating coated and uncoated monolithic polycarbonate sheet material, for monitoring process control, for screening studies, and as an aid in the prediction of hardware performance when exposed to impact service conditions.
A limitation of Type A specimen testing is that a thick sheet may not fail since the available impact energy is limited by the maximum drop height and falling weight capacity of the test apparatus. Use Specimen Type A for material less than 12.7 mm (0.50 in.) thick.
Within the range of drop heights of this system, tests employing different velocities are not expected to produce different results. However, for a given series of tests, it is recommended that the drop height be held approximately constant so that velocity of impact (strain rate) will not be a variable.
As the polycarbonate specimen undergoes large plastic deformation under impact, the down (opposite impact) side is under tensile loading and most influential in initiating failure. Polycarbonate sheet coated on one side may yield significantly different test results when tested with the coated side down versus the coated side up.
Direct comparison of specimen Type A and specimen Type B test results should not be attempted. For test programs that will require the comparison of interlaboratory test results the specimen type and the approximate drop height must be specified.
Monolithic polycarbonate sheet is notch sensitive. Data obtained from other test methods, particularly notched Izod/Charpy test results, and extremely high- or low-strain rate test results, should not be compared directly to data obtained from this method. It is noted that Type A specimens, free of flaws, have not experienced the characteristic ductile-to-brittle transition between thin, less than 3.18 mm (1/8 in.), and thick, greater than 7.94 mm (5/16 in.), sheet as reflected by other test methods.
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the energy required to initiate failure in monolithic polycarbonate sheet material under specified conditions of impact using a free falling weight.
1.2 Two specimen types are defined as follows:
1.2.1 Type A consists of a flat plate test specimen and employs a clamped ring support.
1.2.2 Type B consists of a simply supported three-point loaded beam specimen (Fig. 1) and is recommended for use with material which can not be failed using the Type A specimen. For a maximum drop height of 6.096 m (20 ft) and a maximum drop weight of 22.68 kg (50 lb), virgin polycarbonate greater than 12.70 mm (½ in.) thick will probably require use of the Type B specimen.
Note 1—See also ASTM Methods: D1709, D2444 and D3029.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.3.1 Exception—The inch-pound units in parentheses are provided for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statement, See Section 7.
FIG. 1 Type B Specimen Geometry and Loading
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing
D790 Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials
ICS Number Code 83.140.10 (Films and sheets)
UNSPSC Code 30265802(Plastic sheet)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM F736-95(2011), Standard Test Method for Impact Resistance of Monolithic Polycarbonate Sheet by Means of a Falling Weight , ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, www.astm.orgBack to Top