| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|6||$44.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||6||$44.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Standard + Redline PDF Bundle||12||$52.80||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
4.1 The United States has concentrated attention and testing efforts on surgical scrubbing far more than on hand care in patient-to-patient routines. Great Britain, the originators of infection control nursing, have always had their focus on infection transmission. In the United States, published articles have documented the short exposure time for health care personnel who do wash their hands between patients. The average is less than 10 s. The ideal product for the reduction of transient flora is one that rapidly kills or removes or both the microbial load acquired during health care activities. The emphasis on rapidity is essential simply because health care personnel will not take the necessary time when using conventional hand-washing products. The use of products not intended for use with water has increased dramatically and their use is common in European countries largely because of convenience and effectiveness. A second characteristic is the level of antimicrobial action. The use of a rapid and potent active product to reduce work-acquired microbial flora is ideal.
4.2 Since the change from strictly in-vitro testing of topical antimicrobials for use on skin to simulated use testing in hand washing, prepping, site access testing, and sampling, emphasis has always been on washing hands, agitating, rubbing, and brushing with liquid on the skin site to estimate bacteria removed after testing.
4.4 There is a history of microbial dispersal (9) and increase in surface bacteria from deeper layers resulting from showering (10-12), washing, scrubbing, and agitation. In the normal situation on the skin, there is a superficial, surface flora and a deeper or hidden flora (5). The proportion of one to the other has been addressed by Selwyn (4) and his judgment is that from 20 to 50 % of the flora is “deep.” The intent in skin sampling has almost always been to scrub, agitate, and use surfactant to remove as many organisms as we can. In doing this, we have completely ignored the two types of flora.
4.5 Further, when the skin is treated with a cleansing agent or an antimicrobial that is subsequently rinsed away, the “deep” or “hidden” flora is pushed to the surface as the sebum replenishes the sebum from the sebaceous glands removed in washing. Many early investigators have looked at simpler sampling methods that we now recognize were sampling primarily the superficial transient flora.
1.1 This guide covers test methods and sampling procedure options for leave-on products for consumer and hospital personnel. Leave-on products, such as alcohol hand rubs and lotions containing antimicrobial ingredients, are increasingly marketed and used by consumers and health care personnel. These products are distinguished from conventional washing and scrubbing preparations in that they do not rely on the rinsing, physical removal, and antimicrobial action in determining their effectiveness. Although agitation and friction may serve to release organisms from the skin and folds and crevices, organisms are then killed in situ and are not rinsed from the skin surface before sampling. Appropriate test methods for the hands have been published, while other sampling methods will be needed for testing body areas other than the hands.
1.1.1 Researchers have described techniques to identify the expanded flora we now know can be present on the skin. It is impractical, if not prohibitive to attempt to recover and identify these varieties of organisms with each test. At some point in the design of a test, a decision is necessary for defining the target organisms. Should the sampling be designed to recover as much of the microflora as possible or a particular portion of it? Consideration of transient and resident, superficial and deep, or aerobic and anaerobic flora must be included in defining the objective in testing products. The recovery methods selected for any testing must be based on the projected use of the product type being tested.
1.2 Methods of recovery after application of the contaminating organisms to a part of the body other than by the agitation/rubbing of the hands against a glass petri plate also need examination. Consideration should be given to contact plating, controlled swabbing with a template, and cup scrubbing (detergent/agitation used) since the target organisms for recovery are likely to be on the superficial layers of skin.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
E1174 Test Method for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Health Care Personnel Handwash Formulations
E1327 Test Method for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Handwash Formulations by Utilizing Fingernail Regions
E2755 Test Method for Determining the Bacteria-Eliminating Effectiveness of Hand Sanitizer Formulations Using Hands of Adults
ICS Number Code 11.140 (Hospital equipment)
UNSPSC Code 42191603(Hospital equipment instrument panels)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM E2361-13, Standard Guide for Testing Leave-On Products Using In-Situ Methods, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, www.astm.orgBack to Top