| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|9||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Hardcopy (shipping and handling)||9||$45.00||  ADD TO CART|
|Standard + Redline PDF Bundle||18||$54.00||  ADD TO CART|
Significance and Use
5.1 This practice provides nine figures of merit which may be used to estimate the relative thermal hazard of thermally unstable materials. Since numerous assumptions must be made in order to obtain these figures of merit, care must be exercised to avoid too rigorous interpretation (or even misapplication) of the results.
5.2 This practice may be used for comparative purposes, specification acceptance, and research. It should not be used to predict actual performance.
1.1 This practice covers the calculation of hazard potential figures of merit for exothermic reactions, including:
(3) Critical half thickness,
(4) Critical temperature,
(5) Adiabatic decomposition temperature rise,
(6) Explosion potential,
(7) Shock sensitivity,
(8) Instantaneous power density, and
(9) NFPA instability rating.
1.2 The kinetic parameters needed in this calculation may be obtained from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves by methods described in other documents.
1.3 This technique is the best applicable to simple, single reactions whose behavior can be described by the Arrhenius equation and the general rate law. For reactions which do not meet these conditions, this technique may, with caution, serve as an approximation.
1.4 The calculations and results of this practice might be used to estimate the relative degree of hazard for experimental and research quantities of thermally unstable materials for which little experience and few data are available. Comparable calculations and results performed with data developed for well characterized materials in identical equipment, environment, and geometry are key to the ability to estimate relative hazard.
1.5 The figures of merit calculated as described in this practice are intended to be used only as a guide for the estimation of the relative thermal hazard potential of a system (materials, container, and surroundings). They are not intended to predict actual thermokinetic performance. The calculated errors for these parameters are an intimate part of this practice and must be provided to stress this. It is strongly recommended that those using the data provided by this practice seek the consultation of qualified personnel for proper interpretation.
1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.7 There is no ISO standard equivalent to this practice.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents (purchase separately) The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
Other StandardsNFPA704 Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response, 2012 Available from National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269, http://www.nfpa.org.
C177 Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus
C518 Test Method for Steady-State Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus
E473 Terminology Relating to Thermal Analysis and Rheology
E537 Test Method for The Thermal Stability of Chemicals by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E698 Test Method for Arrhenius Kinetic Constants for Thermally Unstable Materials Using Differential Scanning Calorimetry and the Flynn/Wall/Ozawa Method
E793 Test Method for Enthalpies of Fusion and Crystallization by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E1269 Test Method for Determining Specific Heat Capacity by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E1952 Test Method for Thermal Conductivity and Thermal Diffusivity by Modulated Temperature Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E2041 Test Method for Estimating Kinetic Parameters by Differential Scanning Calorimeter Using the Borchardt and Daniels Method
E2070 Test Method for Kinetic Parameters by Differential Scanning Calorimetry Using Isothermal Methods
E2716 Test Method for Determining Specific Heat Capacity by Sinusoidal Modulated Temperature Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E2890 Test Method for Kinetic Parameters for Thermally Unstable Materials by Differential Scanning Calorimetry Using the Kissinger Method
ICS Number Code 13.230 (Explosion protection)
|Link to Active (This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.)|
ASTM E1231-15, Standard Practice for Calculation of Hazard Potential Figures of Merit for Thermally Unstable Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.orgBack to Top