|
The internationalization of standards can be a complicated business.
This was a topic of discussion at the ASTM Officers Conference,
held in September at Headquarters for new technical committee
officers. One of the most well-attended modules of the conference
was the one for which the staff had prepared presentations on
ASTM in the national and international arenas.
In the discussions that followed the presentations, and in the
answers to our pre-conference questionnaire, our officers told
us they wanted the standards they developed to be used more extensively
around the world. They, especially those who feel their standards
need the global political acceptance they get from the ISO approval
process, already know from experience that internationalization
cannot be approached with any degree of naïveté. The committees
choosing this process must be aware, for instance, that one-half
or more of the voting members in about three-fourths of all ISO
committees where ASTM members participate, represent CEN and CEN
affiliate countries.
ASTM committees should also be aware that greater internationalization
can begin at home. And the process is one that is more familiar.
When ASTM began as the International Association for Testing Materials
in 1898, it was one of the first international standards organizations
in the world. It was formed specifically to develop high quality,
market relevant, widely acceptable, international standards. The
process was based on a few basic concepts. First, our founders
thought that international standards should be developed by a
consensus of technical experts. Secondly, there were to be no
political or monetary barriers to international standardization.
In other words, nationality or wealth was not to be an asset or
a liability. They were of the opinion that the best international
standards should be derived from a global bank of knowledge and
that merit alone should be the price for success. That accounts
for the high quality and the excellence of the technology that
is present in ASTM international standards today. Thirdly, the
ideals of democracy, equality, and intellectual freedom should
form the foundations of behavior for every international committee.
In other words, rights were to be endowed universally and evenly,
especially the right to vote. This accounts for the numbers of
international experts who prefer to do their standards work in
ASTM. And finally, they were of the opinion that an international
community would use standards created by an international work
force. This process has been used for over 100 years, and thousands
of ASTM standards have achieved international acceptance. But
operating in todays global market means it is imperative to raise
the bar.
For those ASTM members who still need political global acceptance,
there is still ISO. They must continue, however, to be aware of
their prospects in ISO, where they must overcome the challenges
connected with one country/one vote, and where CEN and CEN affiliate
countries (33 in all) have 50 percent or more voting members on
80 percent of all ISO committees.(1) For those committees that
want to achieve greater international acceptance for their work
through ASTM, however, there is a viable, ready solution. It lies
in the willingness, and the commitment, to bring as many international
technical experts as possible to the table. That is all that is
required. The rest will follow.
James Thomas
President, ASTM
1 Data compiled from ISO data base at http://www.iso.ch/projects/tcinfoFrame.html
Copyright 2000, ASTM |