Committee on Corrosion of Metals Introduces Two New Standards on Selection of Corrosion Inhibitors
ASTM International Committee G01 on Corrosion of Metals has an ongoing commitment to help the oil field and refinery industries adopt and use state-of-the-art techniques to select corrosion inhibitors. As part of this commitment, two new standards developed by Subcommittee G01.05 on Laboratory Corrosion Tests have recently been published:
• G 184, Practice for Evaluating and Qualifying Oilfield and Refinery Corrosion Inhibitors Using the Rotating Cage; and
• G 185, Practice for Evaluating and Qualifying Oilfield and Refinery Corrosion Inhibitors Using the Rotating Cylinder Electrode.
These standards are the result of almost three years of close collaboration between Task Group G01.05.11 and oil companies, inhibitor suppliers, researchers, consultants, and educators. The two standards support the optimized selection of inhibitors by end users and the development and formulation of more efficient inhibitors by suppliers.
Oil and gas pipelines are vulnerable to corrosion. Corrosion results, in part, from the use of carbon and low-alloy steels in pipeline construction. Although these materials are cost-effective, they characteristically exhibit poor corrosion resistance. To control corrosion, the industry uses corrosion inhibitors, primarily in upstream pipelines carrying oil and gas from the wells to the processing plants. The annual inhibitor market in North America alone is approximately 1.6 billion U.S. dollars.
No single inhibitor, however, suits all situations. The efficiency of an inhibitor depends not only on the volumes and properties of the produced fluids and on the properties of the inhibitor itself, but also on the way it is applied and the operating conditions of the system, such as temperature, flow rate, and pressure.
“Inhibitors should be screened using quantitative methods (rotating cylinder electrode, rotating cage, or jet impingement). Among the quantitative methods, the rotating cylinder electrode is used only up to a wall shear stress (a parameter to correlate the flow effect in different geometries) of 20 Pa, whereas the rotating cage can be used up to 200 Pa,” explained Dr. Sankara Papavinasam, CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
“Publication of standard practices G 184 and G 185 provides the oilfield and refinery industries with a common procedure to conduct experiments for evaluating corrosion inhibitors,” he added. ASTM standard G 170, Guide for Evaluating and Qualifying Oilfield and Refinery Corrosion Inhibitors in the Laboratory, published in 2001, describes procedures to evaluate corrosion inhibitors (including inhibitor efficiency and secondary corrosion inhibitor properties), whereas G 184 and G 185 prescribe procedures to perform rotating cage and rotating cylinder electrode experiments, respectively.
“In the absence of the standards, agreement between the inhibitor supplier, the inhibitor user, and any third-party evaluation laboratory on the merits of specific corrosion inhibitors has often been quite difficult to achieve,” explained Dr. Milan Bartos, Nalco Company, Sugar Land, Texas. “In extreme cases, each laboratory would identify a different inhibitor as the number-one choice. The three laboratories could not agree on which inhibitor would be the best, because each laboratory used a different methodology, or a different procedure. Utilizing standard methodologies, such as Practices G 184 and G 185, to evaluate corrosion inhibitors will be extremely useful in achieving consistency of results among different laboratories.” //
Sankara Papavinasam, CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Milan Bartos, Nalco Energy Services, Sugar Land, Texas
ASTM staff: Leonard Morrissey
Upcoming Meeting: April 23-26, April Committee Week, Toronto, Ontario, Canada