|
Revised Standard Practice Certifies Concrete Laboratories, Personnel
and Equipment
Since its original publication in 1987, ASTM C 1077, Standard Practice for Laboratories Testing Concrete and Concrete
Aggregates for Use in Construction and Criteria for Laboratory
Evaluation, has been used to judge the quality of laboratories
testing concrete. The standard defines the qualifications of personnel,
the control of equipment used in testing, and the establishment
of a quality assurance program within the laboratory.
Many designers and owners require laboratories to meet the criteria
of C 1077 for specific projects; agencies use the standard to
accredit laboratories that test concrete and aggregates.
This year, ASTM Subcommittee C09.98 on Evaluation of Laboratories
within Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates released a major revision
to C 1077. The revised standard will now place a requirement
on all technicians working in the laboratory to be certified by
either ACI (American Concrete Institute) or NICET (National Institute for Certification of Engineering Technicians), said Robert S. Jenkins, corporate consultant, Law Engineering
and Environmental Services, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., and subcommittee
chair.
To define this certification, a task force led by Ray Kolos, manager,
Laboratory Inspections, CCRL (Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory)
of ACI and NIST, drafted a C 1077 revision that under went numerous
subcommittee ballots. Members of the subcommittee, which include
representatives of testing laboratories, government agencies,
concrete producers, and general interest consultants, said Jenkins,
have had definite opinions of the technician-certifications requirements
and have voiced these opinions during our discussions. The prior
versions of the standard only required the technicians to demonstrate
competency to perform a test procedure. There were no requirements
for certification.
During our discussions, he continued, we debated the merits
of both ACI and NICET certification programs and, although we
agreed the two programs were not equal, the consensus of the subcommittee
felt they were good alternatives for technician certification.
There have always been equal camps of ACI and NICET supporters
in the subcommittee during our prolonged discussions, he explained.
It was felt that if a technician made an effort to be certified
by either program, they have demonstrated a desire to be tested
and evaluated on their knowledge of relevant test methods. For
either certification program, the person must study the written
standards and perform the tests correctly.
Technical questions may be directed to Robert S. Jenkins, P. E., Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., 396
Plasters Ave., N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30324-3951 (404/817-0203;
fax: 404/872-5927). Committee C09 meets in June 2001 in Phoenix,
Arizona. For meeting or membership details, contact Staff Manager
Jim Olshefsky, ASTM (610/832-9714). //
Copyright 2000, ASTM |