| Amusement Rides Capture the Worlds Attention
... and ASTM Committee F24 Focuses Its Effort to Meet the Worlds Standards Need
by James L. Seay
Each day, on average, approximately one million guests visit amusement
parks in the United States. Typically, each guest rides six to
eight amusement rides, meaning that a total of six to eight million
rides will be enjoyed on a daily basis. It is estimated that an
equal if not greater number of rides are being experienced daily
outside of the United States. Guest safety is the overriding concern
on each and every ride, whether it be a 100-mph roller coaster,
a spinning tea cup ride, or an air-supported moon bounce attraction.
Safety is the hallmark of the amusement industry and, statistically,
riding on amusement rides is one of the safest forms of entertainment
available to the public.
A little over two decades ago industry professionals recognized
the growing popularity of amusement rides and decided to work
together to establish safety standards that could be used by both
the manufacturers and operators of amusement equipment. Industry
professionalswhich included large theme park representatives,
family park owners, carnival and fair operators, ride manufacturers,
inspectors, and safety consultantsteamed up with consumer representatives
and regulatory officials to establish standards within ASTM Committee
F24 on Amusement Rides and Devices. The standards covered areas
including design and manufacturing, operations, testing, maintenance,
and terminology. The standards, while voluntary, were quickly
accepted by not only the industry but also by many states, which
adoptedeither in part or in wholeASTM F24 standards as part
of their regulations. Each year the committee has met formally
on a biannual basis to review the standards and to consider modifications
and/or additions.
World Standards Task Group Established
The U.S. amusement industry and its impressive growth can be traced
back to the success of Walt Disney in its development of the destination
theme park concept back in the 1950s. Shortly after the opening
of Disneyland, the concept of regional theme parks was established
by Six Flags with Six Flags Over Texas. In the ensuing years the
U.S. market expanded greatly to where it is today, a mix of high-end
theme parks, family amusement parks, water parks, fairs, carnivals,
and family entertainment centers.
The industry as a whole is represented by its trade association,
The International Association for Amusement Parks and Attractions
or IAAPA. Note the word International in IAAPAs name, for during
the last decade there has been explosive growth in the amusement
industry occurring all over the world. In some cases the large
theme park organizations have expanded their business by establishing
U.S. type theme parks throughout the world. But more often local
international organizations have developed their own entertainment
venues and parks often combining standard ride equipment with
their own cultural identity. The expansion of the amusement industry
overseas has resulted in a dramatic increase of international
members in IAAPA, especially recently. The international members
have looked to the trade organization to assist in the establishment
of safety standards that can be used on a worldwide basis.
The members understand that for international development to be
successful, their facilitieslike their counterparts in the United
Statesmust be safe and perceived as such by the public. Recognizing
the issue, in 1998 IAAPA made it clear that international standards
would be a priority and that an effort was needed to establish
standards that would promote safe rides and attractions on a worldwide
basis. Members of ASTM F24 met with IAAPA (who it should be noted
has representation on ASTM F24) and agreed to the importance of
such safety standards. A decision was made by the ASTM F24 main
committee to establish the World Standards Task Group on Amusement
Rides.
Reasons for the World to Participateand Ways to Participate,
Too
The sound basis for the establishment of any type of world standard
is to incorporate input from as many resources as possible beyond
the borders of where the standard is being generated. Fortunately
the very nature of the ASTM process is to be inclusionary and
open. This situation is the opposite of what is typical in other
areas of the world where there are standard bodies establishing
guidelines for amusement rides. In Europe, for instance, there
has been an effort over the past 12 years to establish a standard
that would apply to the European Union. While the product of the
process has been impressive, the effort has been limited to a
very specific group of appointed individuals. The open door policy
of the ASTM F24 effort has been a strong inducement for individuals
and organizations from around the world to participate both in
person and by contributing input through the ballot process.
Another important reason for international interest is that the
number of individual states within the United States who are adopting
ASTM F24 standards is growing quickly. IAAPA encourages states
to adopt F24 standards. Since many of the major states have indeed
incorporated the guidelines into law, any international organization
that wants to do business here in the United States will most
likely have to develop their equipment in accordance with the
accepted guidelines. Obviously, if the guidelines are being further
developed, it is in the international organizations best interest
to participate, thereby ensuring that the final result represents
a blueprint for the safe production of rideswhether they are
designed and built here in the United States or elsewhere in the
world.
An additional reason for international participation is the advancement
of the technical capabilities offered by ASTM. Besides the fact
that with e-mail and instant messaging the world is already getting
smaller, the ASTM online standards development system (Internet-Based
Standards Development Forums) has allowed participation from virtually
anywhere in the world on a real-time basis. The amount of time
normally required to get international input and the potential
costs associated with the effort have been dramatically reduced.
With all the inducements to participate, the international contributions
and commitments to the effort for an F24-created world standard
have been unprecedented. The membership of ASTM F24 has soared
past 300 and international representation has come from all over
with members joining from places like Canada, Italy, Australia,
Holland, Germany, Switzerland, and Russia. This fall, the first
representative from China will take part in the process. To say
the biannual meetings have taken on an international flavor would
be an understatement. We are now dealing with basic challenges
such as visas and translators and the more unique challenges of
gaining an understanding and appreciation of cultural differences.
Hours of Work Worth It
The process has been grueling with literally thousands and thousands
of man-hours being used for the effort. Recognizing the important
safety implications, many organizations from both the United States
and abroad have allowed key individuals to refocus much of their
work efforts toward the development of the standards. The process
has been a mix of highly focused small task group meetings that
take place in between the traditional ASTM F24 biannual gatherings
and large, two-day overview meetings during those biannual fall
and spring meetings.
The decision was made to focus initially on a design and manufacturing
standard and the work has proceeded very well. The task group
took the approach of reviewing every available standard throughout
the world and comparing each specific section with its counterpart
in ASTM F24 standards. In some cases, the existing standard was
felt to be the most effective and the present language was left
untouched. In other cases, the task group adopted alternative
language into the F24 standard that provided clearer intent and
direction. A specific effort was made throughout the process to
ensure that recognition of equivalent international processes
(i.e., welding) was included. Also language was added in the annex
and appendix, wherever appropriate, to further clarify the intent
of the standards and remove potential gray areas. This summer
a significant portion of the new F24 standard on design and manufacturing,
intended and ready for international use, will be out for ballot.
While the existing effective F24 standard had limited text and
relied significantly on reference materials, the new document
will include significant detail and valuable appendix and annex
supplements. The length of the standard is expected to be well
over 100 pages (and keep in mind this is just the design and manufacturing
effort). Very soon work will begin on other areas of the existing
document such as operations, testing, and maintenance.
The natural process of this F24 world standard effort is creating
an effective document that will be well suited for adoption on
a worldwide basis. We already have an accepted document that,
for many years, has been very valuable to the amusement industry
and the general public in the promotion of safe amusement rides
and attractions. We now have a document that has incorporated
valuable input on a worldwide basis and will provide extensive
detail and instruction. And most importantly, we have had an open
door policy that has allowed the free exchange of information
and ideas and has encouraged healthy discussion on the various
subjects.
The adoption of the ASTM F 24 standard on a worldwide basis will
be no easy task. Most likely an effort will be made to have countries
globally adopt the ASTM F24 standard in whole once the world standards
effort is complete. It is vitally important to keep in mind that
the basis of everyones efforts with regard to the development
of world standards for the amusement industry is to firmly maintain
safety within the industry. In the final analysis, whichever standards
effort produces the safest environment for our guests needs to
be embraced by all. On this point we should be passionate. //
Copyright 2001, ASTM |