The Handbook of Standardization

  • A Guide to Understanding Today's
    Global Standards Development Systems


A LITTLE HISTORY

In the United States we think of Eli Whitney as the father of standardization.

In 1780, Vice President Thomas Jefferson granted Whitney a contract to produce 10,000 muskets.

Whitney divided the production process into simple operations and demonstrated mass production as a feasible and economical alternative to making each part of an assembly by hand to fit. To demonstrate the value of the process in the strongest possible terms, Whitney carried several boxes of mixed musket parts into the office of the secretary of war.

Asking the spectators to pick parts out of the boxes at random, he assembled 10 muskets. Legend has it that he proved they would fire safely by firing each one, without a projectile, right there in the secretary’s office.

Efforts to coordinate standards development in the United States began around the turn of this century. A key factor spurring these efforts was the realization that technical standards were needed to ensure the safety of many new products of the industrial age.

In 1898, for example, ASTM was formed by a group of engineers who recognized the need for standards for the steel used in railroad rails, which were too often of inferior quality. In the 100 years since, standardization has grown in sophistication around the world, with thousands of standards promulgated by national, regional, and international groups.

Standards are a fundamental part of our daily lives for a multitude of reasons. They open channels of communication and commerce, promote understanding of the products of technology, ensure compatibility, enable mass production, and most importantly they form the basis of achieving health, safety, and a higher quality of life.

We are literally surrounded by standards. The buildings we live in, the airplanes we fly on, the roads we travel, the computers we operate, even the clothes we wear are all manufactured in accordance with standards. All these things "work" smoothly and efficiently if the standards to which they were manufactured were properly developed and applied.

Because of the ever-growing importance of standards, this booklet has been developed to cover the standards system in the United States and its relationship to global standards. It explains how standards are developed by the private and public sectors, and gives an overview of the major organizations involved with standards. When examples are given to illustrate a point, ASTM will be cited. ASTM is one of the world’s largest standards developing organizations.

What Is a Standard?
A standard is a common language that promotes the flow of goods between buyer and seller and protects the general welfare. One example comes from building design. When architects design a building, they stipulate exactly what steel is required by referencing a standard specification on the drawing. They may, for example, refer to "ASTM A 36," which is a specification for structural steel. This one document is the simplest and best possible way to communicate to the contractor the type of steel desired in terms of composition, strength, and quality. ASTM Specification A 36 is a three-page publication describing the requirements that the steel must meet. Architects do not have to consult volumes of reference books and expend reams of paper and costly hours describing steel thickness, tensile strength, and other characteristics.

Thousands of such standards are readily available, and thanks to the common language of standardization, buyer and seller have little difficulty communicating.

The U.S. Standards System
The United States is very different from other countries of the world, where usually one organization is designated as the major standards developer and that organization is closely tied to, if not a part of the government. There are hundreds of organizations that comprise the U.S. standardization system including government and non-government organizations.

In the United States, there are essentially two broad categories of standards with regard to regulation--mandatory and voluntary.

Mandatory standards are set by government and can be either procurement or regulatory standards. A procurement standard sets out the requirements that must be met by government suppliers; regulatory standards may set health, safety, environmental, or other criteria.

Voluntary standards--In the United States, the voluntary standards development system is called "voluntary" for two reasons. First, participation in the system is voluntary. Second, the standards produced usually are intended for voluntary use. Voluntary consensus standards are developed through the participation of all interested stakeholders including producers, users, consumers, and representatives of government and academia.

In the United States, the distinction between voluntary and mandatory standards is not clear cut. Often, government standards developers refer in their regulations to privately developed standards, and in that reference give the standard the force of federal, state, or local law. Building codes, for example, reference hundreds of standards developed by voluntary standards organizations. Since building codes are the province of government, the referenced standards have the force of law and must be adhered to. Regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development also reference hundreds, if not thousands of voluntary consensus standards in lieu of developing their own documents. These too, have the force of law once they are referenced in a government regulation. In the wake of the U.S. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (Public Law 104--113), which requires government agencies to use privately developed standards whenever it is at all possible, this practice is on the increase, saving taxpayers millions of dollars in formerly duplicative standards development efforts.

Who Develops Standards in the United States?
Following is a breakdown of some of the major players in the U.S. standards development system.

ANSI--The American National Standards Institute is as close as the United States comes to a central voice for standards development. A not-for-profit, non-governmental organization based in New York, N.Y., ANSI does not develop standards; its major role is to serve as the U.S. member body to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), coordinating the U.S. position in the development of these international standards. In addition, ANSI accredits standards developing organizations (SDOs) according to their consensus processes and accredits standards developed by SDOs as American National Standards. (www.ansi.org)

NIST--The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has the explicit mission of assisting U.S. industry to advance its performance in the development and application of technology. Today, NIST is the U.S. government agency with leading expertise in the area of technology standards and industry standardization issues and its staff is involved in both U.S. and international voluntary consensus standards development activities. (www.nist.gov)

Government Agencies--As mentioned above, the U.S. government is also a standards developer. While the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act encourages less and less actual development of standards within government agencies, government employees participate in the development of, and reference, standards developed in the private sector. U.S. government agencies that rely on standards run the gamut from the Department of Agriculture, through the General Services Administration, to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Other types of SDOs in the United States include professional societies, industry associations, membership organizations, and consortia.

Standards Development Abroad
So how do things get done elsewhere in the world, and how does the United States standards development system fit into international standardization?

ISO--The International Organization for Standardization, a private international agency, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, is dedicated to the development of voluntary standards. Its membership consists of the recognized national standards bodies of 133 nations. ISO has over 180 technical committees devoted to almost all areas of international standardization except for electrical and electronic standards (covered by the IEC, see below) and telecommunications (covered by the ITU, see below). The final publication of an ISO standard requires the majority consensus of technical committee members and 75 percent of the ISO voting membership. (www.iso.ch)

IEC--The International Electrotechnical Commission, an international voluntary organization headquartered in Geneva, is responsible for international standards in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. Its main concern is the development of specification standards for products and devices. Its membership consists of the presidents from the national committees of over 50 countries. In addition to developing and issuing standards, IEC issues publications and recommendations for international standards, as well as promoting safety, compatibility, interchangeability, and acceptability. (www.iec.ch)

ITU--The International Telecommunications Union is the only international SDO that is non-voluntary. It is a treaty organization run under the auspices of the United Nations. Governments, not industry, administer and enforce the regulatory telecommunications standards that come out of the ITU. The U.S. Department of State is the U.S. representative to the ITU. (www.itu.int) For both ISO and IEC, ANSI is the member body representing the United States. ANSI coordinates technical advisory groups (TAGs) that represent U.S. interests at both ISO and IEC. ASTM holds close to 200 TAGs in ISO.

How Do Voluntary Standards Get Written?
Now that we’ve outlined the structure of standards development from here to Geneva, lets step back and explore how a standard development activity gets started within the U.S. voluntary system.

As mentioned, a full consensus standard is developed by a cross-section of stakeholders with an interest in its use. When there is a need for new standards, requests can come from trade associations, governmental agencies, and professional societies that do not create their own standards; or manufacturers, consumer groups, and even individuals. The exact process of forming technical committees and developing and approving the draft standard varies from SDO to SDO.

Generally, standards-writing committees are groups of experts who volunteer their time in draft-development sessions. They are seeking the mutual benefit of all concerned through consensus. As an illustration of how SDOs develop standards, we’ll follow the ASTM system.

ASTM--The diversity of ASTM’s membership is perhaps its most distinct quality and is a large part of what distinguishes the Society’s development and approval process from other organizations. Standards development at ASTM means working alongside competitors, customers, regulatory bodies, and other stakeholders to debate technical issues, share research data, and exchange knowledge. Through the ASTM process, these stakeholders learn to capitalize on their diversity and work in partnership with each other to resolve their differences during the standards development process rather than after.

Coupled with this cooperative system of standards development is the ensuring of fairness through:
1) a required balance of interest between producers, users, and general interest members and
2) a voting process that ensures due process. The ASTM process transcends what entities could do individually because it bridges gaps of technology, combines resources and overcomes lines of competition. The result is a product of the highest credibility, integrity, and marketplace acceptance.

Understanding the hierarchy within ASTM is integral to appreciating the value of the ASTM standards development and approval process. The hierarchy comprises three basic levels: main committees, subcommittees, and task groups. Task groups perform most of the "leg-work" and research that forms the basis of draft standards. Once the group completes its work, it forwards these drafts through the hierarchy for review and voting. The standard must gain subcommittee, main committee, and Society approval before becoming an official ASTM standard.

At each level, voting requirements are enforced to ensure fairness. When the draft has been reviewed and accepted at all levels, the draft becomes an ASTM standard and is published. Depending upon the need for the standard, drafting and approval can occur in a few months, a year, or more.

The Standards Incentive
We have seen how the impetus for standards development can come from many different sources, but what are the incentives that bring these groups into the standards arena?

Standards are seldom the products of altruism. Individuals and organizations become involved in standards writing for very specific reasons. Among them are:

The Economic Incentive--Both producers and consumers reap the benefits of standards, which are the ability to manufacture and purchase more economically through mass production, to lower inventories by eliminating unnecessary grades, and to improve quality control.

The Public Service Incentive--Virtually every government agency is active in the standards forum because each has an obligation to act in the public interest. In the development of standards, representatives of government often serve as the spokesmen or voting voice of the consumer.

The Individual Incentive--Participation on a standards committee provides an outstanding opportunity for individual professional growth. Participants become more proficient in their fields and develop broader understanding, which often leads to wide recognition among their peers.

The Shared Work Incentive--Simply stated, it is far easier to arrive at solutions when the knowledge and practical skills of many are brought to bear on a problem. This is precisely what happens at the standards table­the members lend their collective expertise to producing meaningful documents and at the same time, by their participation, they preclude the development of standards that would serve only narrow interests. Inevitably, the final product is far greater than the sum of its parts.
Standards provide a way to speak an international language that ensures product consistency and compatibility, enhanced competition, technology diffusion, and the public welfare across international borders. The national and international standards development system is an important subject to learn about and master as everyone, from small business entrepreneur to CEO, from engineer to government official, grapples with the broad bottom-line implications of standards.

About ASTM
One of the largest standards development systems in the world, ASTM was formed in 1898 to provide an arena in which engineers, academics, and other stakeholders could create standards for steel railroad ties.

In the more than 100 years since, ASTM has met the standards development needs of over 100 sectors, from construction materials and environmental risk assessment, to medical devices and petroleum products.

ASTM provides a voluntary consensus system for managing standards development and makes its standards available in a variety of print and electronic formats, as well as providing laboratory proficiency testing programs and training in the use of standards.
Visit our Web site www.astm.org for a full description of our many products and services.

ASTM
100 Barr Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
U.S.A.

www.astm.org
Phone: 610/832-9500
Fax: 610/832-9555
E-mail: service@astm.org

European Office
27-29 Knowl Piece
Wilbury Way
Hitchin, Herts
SG4 OSX
United Kingdom
New technologies permitting Internet-based standards development increase international participation and speed up the standards development process. An example of this is ASTM’s Standards Development Forums.

STANDARDS IN THE WORLD AROUND YOU

Standards are a part of almost everything around you. Did you ever consider...

The consistency of aviation fuel--Your plane takes off in New York and lands in Caracas, Venezuela. Refueling in Caracas is not a problem because an ASTM specification for aviation fuel is used around the world to ensure the consistent quality and safety of the fuel.

The safety of playground equipment--A fall from monkey bars in the playground can be dangerous for a tot. Materials used as surfaces under that equipment can be tested to determine how well they cushion falls.

Standards in your home--There are ASTM standards to cover the insulation in your walls, the materials on your roof, the soil quality and even the soil compaction under your foundation, the cement in your driveway, and the fire resistance of the materials of which your home is made...
to name just a few! Moreover, there are standards for the home and leisure products you buy for yourself and your children--bike helmets, high chairs, toys, art materials, sports equipment--many of which were developed at the request of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

WHAT KIND OF STANDARDS ARE THERE

There are at least five kinds of standards, based on the degree of consensus needed for their development and use.

Company Standard
Consensus among the employees of an organization.

Consortium Standard
Consensus among a small group of organizations, usually like-minded companies formed to undertake an activity that is beyond the resources of any one member. An example of a consortium is the United States Council for Automotive Research’s (USCAR’s) Strategic Standardization Board, which reflects USCAR’s commitment to managing standards issues with regard to competitiveness.

Industry Standard
Consensus among the many companies within an association or professional society. An example is a standard developed by the American Petroleum Institute (API), a trade association that is comprised of many different petroleum companies.

Government Standard
May reflect many degrees of consensus. Some are written by individuals in government agencies, many are now being developed in the private sector and then adopted by reference as mandatory standards. Standards incorporated into federal regulations under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) are examples of government standards.

Voluntary Consensus
Standard

Consensus is developed by representatives of all sectors that have an interest in the use of the standard. These sectors can include producers, users, and those having a general interest (representatives of government and academia), as well as ultimate consumers. Consensus standards, with their broad input, are considered by many as the most technically sound and most credible documents. They are often used as the basis for commercial and regulatory action. Examples of voluntary consensus standards developing organizations include ASTM, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).

Standards simplify
commerce in

industrialized society. Their absence would greatly complicate the task of the user in specifying his needs and of the producer in meeting them.

Standards provide:

• Improved communication between buyer and seller.

• Greater user confidence in the commodities they buy.

• Better understanding of how to use the commodity.

• Greater public safety in the use of the commodity.

• Better quality control.

• Lower inventories for both producer and user through elimination of unnecessary grades.

• Earlier delivery because of the ability to stock standard items.

• Better performance at lower prices through reduced need for negotiations and more efficient inspection and testing.

• Lower prices to the user through a more rational basis for competitive bidding.