LoginSite MapOnline SupportContactPrivacy PolicyIP Policy
Site Search
 
View Shopping Cart

Books & Journals/Journal of Forensic Sciences/Citation Page/

Volume 36, Issue 3 (May 1991)

ISSN: 0022-1198
Published Online: 1 May 1991
Page Count: 6

Click here to download this paper now for $25

View License Agreement

Alleged Brain Damage, Diminished Capacity, Mens Rea, and Misuse of Medical Concepts
Perr, IN
Professor of psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine andDentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ.


Abstract
As focus on the insanity defense diminishes, defendants may place emphasis on a lack of knowing or purposeful behavior in order to negate a criminal charge. This use of a mens rea defense in accord with Model Penal Code principles is exemplified by the current New Jersey statute. Such a defense may result in a lesser charge or a finding of not guilty. In addition to reviewing applicable law, this report presents a sex offense case in which remote brain damage was invoked as a purported basis for incapacity to formulate the required intent; the study also raises the issue of the inappropriate or questionable use of medical principles, a practice that diminishes professional credibility in the courts and in the community.

Keywords:
brain damage, criminal sex offenses, diminished capacity, forensic science, intent, jurisprudence, knowingly, mens rca, mens rea, misuse of concepts, purposely

Paper ID: JFS363910722

ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.
Author Perr IN Title Alleged Brain Damage, Diminished Capacity, Mens Rea, and Misuse of Medical Concepts Symposium , Committee on