STP1431

    Spinal Implants: Are We Evaluating Them Appropriately?

    Melkerson MN, Kirkpatrick JS, Griffith S

    Pages: 233

    Published: 2003

    Purchase Print    $118

    Purchase Print + PDF    $177.00
       Save 25%    more info


    More About this Product

    Overview

    Related Products Table of Contents

    Meet the challenges and demands facing professionals in the dynamic field of spinal implants. Sections cover:

    Spinal Constructs presents developments and results associated with the application of ASTM F1717 test methods. Papers describe the clinical results from spinal constructs having marketing clearance or approval using these test methods; address device failure modes; and examine corrosion seen with explanted devices. Other papers evaluate impact on results due to gauge length used in tests; mobility or constraint of the test blocks; and use of transverse rod connections.

    Spinal Device Components, Subassemblies, and Interconnections using ASTM F1798, this section discusses test methods for new components or modifications to existing components of a construct. Papers describe the impact from application of different transverse connector designs on clinical outcomes; and evaluate impact on bench testing results due to protection of the longitudinal member, anchoring materials, gauge length, mobility or constraint of the test blocks.

    Interbody Spacers and Intervertebral Body Fusion Devices provides the latest developments and results associated with the application of ASTM F2077 test methods for intervertebral body fusion devices. Papers cover the clinical results from lumbar interbody fusion devices; the causes of some of these devices that extruded; strength testing methodologies; and the usefulness of pull-out or push-out testing for spinal cages.

    Functional Spinal Devices and/or Artificial Discs examines comparative cadaveric testing, durability testing, and alternative test methods for spinal constructs intended for posterior stabilization without fusion.

    Suggested Test Methods, Models, Fixtures, or Needed Improvements addresses today's limitations and tomorrow's concerns in spinal implants standards. Some papers describe the results from alternative models for fusion, non-fusion, or functional spinal implants; and others examine the impact on testing due to preload, block design, and material properties.

    Audience: This new publication is a valuable resource for designing engineers, surgeons, researchers, and regulatory entities who test and evaluate the appropriateness of a devices' design and materials.


    Table of Contents

    History of Isola-VSP Fatigue Testing Results with Correlation to Clinical Implant Failures
    Akbarnia B., Asher M., Boachie-Adjei O., Carson W., Dzioba R., Lebwohl N.

    Gauge Length and Mobility of Test Blocks Strongly Affect the Strength and Stiffness of Posterior Occipito-Cervico-Thoracic Corpectomy Constructs
    Selvitelli D., Serhan H., Slivka M., Torres K.

    Relative 3 Dimensional Motions between End Vertebrae in a Bi-level Construct, the Effect of Fixture Constraints on Test Results
    Carson W.

    Spinal Implant Transverse Rod Connectors: A Delicate Balance Between Stability and Fatigue Performance
    Serhan H., Slivka M.

    Corrosion on Spinal Implant Constructs: Should Standards Be Revised?
    Beck P., Bibbs M., Kirkpatrick J., Lemons J., Venugolopalan R.

    Effect of Transverse Connector Design on Development of Late Operative Site Pain: Preliminary Clinical Findings
    Asher M., Carson W., Cook S., Lai S.

    Interconnection Strength Testing and its Value in Evaluating Clinical Performance
    Campbell S., Gray E., Jensen L., Springer S.

    Protection of the Longitudinal Member Interconnection by ASTM F 1798-97 Interconnection Mechanism and Subassemblies Standard Guide
    Carson W.

    Clinical Relevance of Pull-out Strength Testing of Pedicle Screws
    Boschert P., Dawson J., Macenski M., Rand N.

    Extrusion of Interbody Fusion Devices—Clinical Examples
    Theiss S.

    Is Push-out Testing of Cage Devices Worthwhile in Evaluating Clinical Performance?
    Campbell S., Houfburg R., Pavlovic J., Shinbrot A., Springer S.

    A Comparison of Two Strength-Testing Methodologies for Interbody Structural Allografts for Spinal Fusion
    Dawson J., Griffith S.

    The Influence of In Vitro Testing Method on Measured Intervertebral Disc Characteristics
    Huber G., Ito K., Linke B., Morlock M.

    Testing of Human Cadaveric Functional Spinal Units to the ASTM Draft Standard, “Standard Test Methods for Static and Dynamic Characterization of Spinal Artificial Discs”
    Crisco J., Paiva J., Spenciner D.

    Durability Test Method for a Prosthetic Nucleus (PN)
    Bao Q., Hudgins R.

    Mechanical Analogue Model of the Human Lumbar Spine: Development and Initial Evaluation
    Friis E., Graber C., Montoya J., Pence C.

    An Improved Biomechanical Testing Protocol For Evaluating Multilevel Cervical Instrumentation In A Human Cadaveric Corpectomy Model
    DiAngelo D., Foley K.

    Influence of Preload in Flexibility Testing of Native and Instrumented Lumbar Spine Specimens
    Knöller S., Linke B., Meyer G., Schneider E.

    Transverse Connectors: Clinical Objectives, Biomechanical Parameters Involved in Their Achievement, and Summary of Current and Needed In Vitro Tests
    Akbarnia B., Asher M., Boachie-Adjai O., Carson W.

    An Evaluation of the Influence of UHMWPE Test Block Design on the Mechanical Performance of Bilateral Lumbar Corpectomy Constructs
    Cesarone D., Dunbar W., Serhan H.

    Vertebral Bone Density—A Critical Element in the Performance of Spinal Implants
    Dvorak M., Fisher C., Kwon B., Oxland T., Samarasekera D., Tan J.

    Author Index

    Subject Index


    Committee: F04

    Paper ID: STP1431-EB

    DOI: 10.1520/STP1431-EB

    ISBN-EB: 978-0-8031-5480-3

    ISBN-PRINT: 978-0-8031-3463-8

    ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

    0-8031-3463-0
    978-0-8031-3463-8
    STP1431-EB