You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.


    Fatigue to Fracture: An Informative, Fast, and Reliable Approach for Assessing Medical Implant Durability

    Published: Jan 2010

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (752K) 14 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (41M) 14 $55   ADD TO CART


    This paper compares the differences between the “test to success” and “test to fracture” paradigms for medical implant durability assessment. It recognizes that test to success can be one of the tests within test to fracture, in addition to a series of shorter cycle, higher force/deformation tests. In addition, by “testing to fracture,” one can validate the fatigue analysis capability, learn the consequences of in vitro fractures, and provide information that can either be used for product improvement or for clinicians to make life-saving decisions.


    fatigue, durability, fracture, medical implant, FEA

    Author Information:

    Gong, X. -Y.
    Medical Implant Mechanics, LLC, Aliso Viejo, CA

    Chwirut, D. J.
    CardioMed Device Consultants, Rockville, MD

    Mitchell, M. R.
    Mechanics and Materials Consulting, LLC, Flagstaff, AZ

    Choules, B. D.
    Med Institute, West Lafayette, IN

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.03

    DOI: 10.1520/STP48992S

    CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.