STP789: Residential Sidewall Insulation Case Histories, Including Experiences and Problems in the Field Application of Loose Fill

    Infante, LJ
    Insulation Group, Research and Development, Certain Teed Corporation, Blue Bell, Pa.

    Aller, PF
    Insulation Group, Research and Development, Certain Teed Corporation, Blue Bell, Pa.

    Fay, RE
    Insulation Group, Research and Development, Certain Teed Corporation, Blue Bell, Pa.

    Pages: 18    Published: Jan 1983


    Abstract

    An unbonded fiberglass loose-fill insulation was selected for this sidewall application study. The insert tube technique is described and the parameters that affect pneumatic application of the product are identified. The initial evaluation was conducted in the laboratory and included density and thermal testing. The laboratory results were then utilized in field studies.

    Ten homes with no sidewall insulation were retrofitted. Thermographic scans of sidewalls before and after retrofit confirmed the predicted reductions in heat loss based on calculation techniques given in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. The improvement was further confirmed by comparing utility bills. Typical problems that occur while preparing a house for sidewall retrofit are discussed. The simple payback for typical houses is presented.

    Good correlation is shown between laboratory test results and field performance. Test data indicate that the application procedure used gave an “effective R-value per product claim”.

    Keywords:

    unbonded fiberglass insulation, insert tube, case histories, sidewalls, thermography, pneumatic application, loose fill, application problems


    Paper ID: STP29456S

    Committee/Subcommittee: C16.23

    DOI: 10.1520/STP29456S


    CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.