SEDL / STP / STP1133-EB / STP19174S



A Comparative Study of Permeation Tests: Gravimetric Method vs ASTM Method F-739

Lara, J
Senior Researcher, Institut de Recherche en Santé et en Securité du Travail du Québec (IRSST), Montreal,Quebec

de Merchant, J
Graduate student, McGill University, Montreal,Quebec

Ketelson, H
Graduate student, McGill University, Montreal,Quebec


Pages: 19    Published: Jan 1992


Download this paper for $25 PDF (288K)          View License Agreement
        Click here to download the complete source publication for $91 PDF (18M)


Source: STP1133-EB


Abstract

A comparative study of the F-739 ASTM permeation test method and the gravimetric test method using different types of gravimetric permeation cells was performed. Two aluminum gravimetric cup cells and one commercial glass jar was used. Independent of the type of gravimetric permeation cell used, breakthrough time and permeation rate values obtained using the gravimetric method are equivalent to those obtained using the ASTM method. Problems with safe handling and with the cell seals were found with the first type of cup cell tried. A new type of conical cell that is easier to handle was developed.


Keywords:
permeation cell, gravimetric method

Paper ID: STP19174S
Committee/Subcommittee: F23.96
DOI: 10.1520/STP19174S
CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.