Intermetallic Precipitates in Zirconium-Niobium Alloys

    Published: Jan 1989

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (292K) 9 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (19M) 9 $148   ADD TO CART


    Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) have Seen used to study the composition and structure of intermetallic precipitates, principally those containing iron and chromium, in Zr-2.5wt%Nb pressure tubing and Zr-lwt%Nb fuel sheathing. The Zr-lwt%Nb fuel sheathing contained Zr(FeCr)2 Laves phase precipitates with either the C-14 hexagonal or C-15 cubic structure. Orthorhombic Zr3Fe precipitates were also tentatively identified. Tetragonal Zr2Fe precipitates were found in Zr-2.5wt%Nb pressure tubing containing 700-ppm iron. The volume fraction of Zr2Fe was very small (<0.1% on an area basis) and was much smaller than the volume fraction of Zr(FeCr)2 precipitates in Zr-1wt%Nb.

    The difference in type and volume fraction of iron-containing precipitates in Zr-lwt%Nb and Zr-2.5wt%Nb despite similar iron and chromium contents is tentatively attributed to the different volume fractions of the β-phase. Iron is a β-stabilizer and concentrates in the β-phase. The Zr-2.5wt%Nb alloy, which contains the higher volume fraction of β-phase, takes in more iron in solution in the β-phase thus leaving less to precipitate out as an intermetallic.


    Zr-Nb alloys, fuel sheathing, pressure tubing, intermetallic precipitates, Zr(FeCr), 2, Zr, 3, Fe, Zr, 2, Fe

    Author Information:

    Meng, X
    Ph.D. student and professor and department head, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario

    Northwood, DO
    Ph.D. student and professor and department head, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario

    Committee/Subcommittee: B10.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP18882S

    CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.