STP1171

    Effect of Constraint on Specimen Dimensions Needed to Obtain Structurally Relevant Toughness Measures

    Published: Jan 1993


      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (516K) 25 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (9.0M) 25 $122   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    This study examines the feasibility of predicting the fracture toughness for structurally relevant situations (shallow cracks in thick plates) based on toughness values measured with experimentally convenient specimen geometries (deep cracks in small specimens). The cleavage fracture toughness, Jc, of ASTM A515 Grade 70 steel plate was measured using single edge notch bend specimens. Specimen size and initial crack depth were varied to obtain Jc values over a range of constraint conditions. The results of these experiments indicate that crack depth and thickness cannot be traded off against each other to achieve the same constraint and thereby the same fracture toughness. The absence of this simple trade-off is due to the greater effect of crack depth than of specimen size on Jc and to the scatter in fracture toughness data characteristic of temperatures in the transition range. Alternative techniques for determining structurally relevant toughness measures from specimens based on recently proposed constraint parameters were therefore examined. These various parameters divide into two categories: those which index constraint and those which correct for constraint. Application of these constraint parameters to the A515 data indicate that all of the currently proposed techniques can account for the constraint-induced changes in cleavage fracture toughness. However, the feasibility of applying these techniques during a structural fracture safety assessment depends upon the experimental complexity and cost associated with fracture toughness determination and the ease with which the constraint parameter can be calculated for a structure.

    Keywords:

    constraint, fracture toughness, cleavage, size effects, T, -stress, Q, -stress, micromechanics


    Author Information:

    Kirk, MT
    Mechanical engineersenior research engineergraduate research assistant, David Taylor Research CenterThe Edison Welding InstituteUniversity of Illinois, AnnapolisColumbusUrbane, MDOHIL

    Koppenhoefer, KC
    Mechanical engineersenior research engineergraduate research assistant, David Taylor Research CenterThe Edison Welding InstituteUniversity of Illinois, AnnapolisColumbusUrbane, MDOHIL

    Shih, CF
    Professor, Brown University, Providence, RI


    Paper ID: STP18024S

    Committee/Subcommittee: E08.04

    DOI: 10.1520/STP18024S


    CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.