Comparison of Static and Impact Energy Absorption of Carbon Fiber/PEEK Composite Tubes

    Published: Jan 1996

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF (816K) 16 $25   ADD TO CART
    Complete Source PDF (12M) 16 $142   ADD TO CART


    Carbon polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composite tubes with different fiber orientations of 0°, ±5°, and ±10° have been investigated. Composite tubes were tested under two different conditions. One set of tubes was quasi-static tested at 1.67×10−5 m/s using a servo-hydraulic machine. Another set of tubes was impact tested at 8.5 m/s using a drop-weight testing machine. All the composite tubes were progressively crushed from the chamfered end. Quasi-static-tested tubes displayed higher specific energy absorption than the impact-tested tubes. This difference was attributed to the changes in the crushing mechanisms with the crushing speed. Quasi-static-tested tubes were crushed by splaying of tube wall into well-defined fronds whereas impact-tested tubes were crushed by brittle fracture of the tube wall. Brittle fracture of the tube wall was attributed to the reduced fracture toughness of carbon/PEEK composite materials at high strain rates. The specific energy absorption capability increased with increasing θ. The large number of fiber fractures observed in the crush zone might have contributed to the superior energy absorption capability of ±10° tubes.


    composite materials, tubes, axial compression, static testing, impact testing, specific energy absorption, carbon fibers, polyether etherketone, fiber architecture, testing, design

    Author Information:

    Hamada, H
    Associate professor and lecturer, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto,

    Ramakrishna, S
    Associate professor and lecturer, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto,

    Committee/Subcommittee: D30.02

    DOI: 10.1520/STP16545S

    CrossRef ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.