Toughness Characterization of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: Which Standard to Use?

    Volume 32, Issue 2 (March 2004)

    ISSN: 0090-3973

    CODEN: JTEOAD

    Page Count: 5


    Banthia, N
    The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,

    Mindess, S
    The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,

    (Received 24 February 2003; accepted 21 October 2003)

    Abstract

    The major advantage of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) over its plain counterpart is in its improved energy absorption capability, or ‘toughness.’ There are currently several standard test methods available to characterize the toughness of fiber-reinforced concrete, but little is known of the relationship between the toughness results they produce for a given fiber-reinforced concrete. An attempt is made here to compare the results produced by three of these techniques: ASTM C 1018, ASTM C 1399, and JSCE SF-4 for the same concrete and to assess the subjectivity encountered in toughness characterization. It was found that there is no firm and reliable correlation between these three procedures; they would rank different FRCs differently. Only a weak correlation exists between the toughness parameters generated by the C 1399 and the SF-4 standards, and the correlation is highly dependent on the fiber type. The ASTM C 1018 procedure is the least reliable of all and produces Toughness Indices and RM,N values that are very difficult to interpret.


    Paper ID: JTE11901

    DOI: 10.1520/JTE11901

    ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Toughness Characterization of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: Which Standard to Use?
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee D18