Experimental Evaluation of a Laboratory Twin-Probe Nuclear Gage for Specimen Density Measurement

    Volume 20, Issue 1 (January 1992)

    ISSN: 0090-3973

    CODEN: JTEOAD

    Page Count: 7


    Fwa, TF
    Senior Lecturer, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge,

    Tan, SA
    Senior Lecturer, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge,

    (Received 27 June 1990; accepted 8 May 1991)

    Abstract

    This paper describes a series of tests conducted to establish the operating requirements of a laboratory twin-probe nuclear gage for density measurement of cylindrical specimens of homogeneous materials. The nuclear device is an adaptation of a direct transmission field gage for laboratory density measurement. It is shown in this evaluation program that three forms of analysis are required for the setting up of such an apparatus: calibration analysis, precision evaluation, and accuracy assessment. Three specimen diameters (75, 100, and 150 mm), three materials with densities from 0.8 to 2.7 g/cm3, and nuclear gage source-to-detector spacings ranging from 250 to 450 mm were included in the evaluation program.

    It was found that density calibration based on radiation attenuation theory is valid, and that a diameter-count rate relationship can be established experimentally so that only a single set of density calibration using one specimen diameter is needed for routine testing. In the accuracy assessment, it was found that there exists a narrow range of source-to-detector spacings for unbiased density estimation. A spacing of 280 mm is recommended for the device studied. At this spacing, the density measurement precision at 95% confidence level, using four 1-min counts per test, is found to vary from 0.010 g/cm3 for 150-mm-diameter specimens to 0.017 g/cm3 for 75-mm-diameter specimens.


    Paper ID: JTE11897J

    DOI: 10.1520/JTE11897J

    ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Experimental Evaluation of a Laboratory Twin-Probe Nuclear Gage for Specimen Density Measurement
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee D30