ISSN: 0090-3973
Page Count: 7

Inconsistencies between CTOD and J Calculations

Wilson, CD
Graduate student and professor,The University of Tennessee,TN,

Landes, JD
Graduate student and professor,The University of Tennessee,TN,

(Received 23 November 1993; accepted 25 May 1994)

Abstract

Crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) determined using the plastic hinge model included in the ASTM E 1290 (Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement) is inconsistent with CTOD determined using the ASTM E 813 (Test Method for J^Ic. Measure of Fracture Toughness) combined with an equation relating J to CTOD. The plastic hinge model is also inconsistent with the EPRI handbook estimation scheme. The plastic hinge model is highly inaccurate for hardening materials. To explore these inconsistencies, the EPRI scheme was used to generate theoretical load-displacement curves of a compact tension (CT) specimen for a wide range of materials and crack sizes. An alternate equation, derived for a power law hardening material, is shown to be consistent with both the ASTM E 813 and the EPRI handbook estimation scheme. The alternate equation accounts for nonlinearities in the relationship between CTOD and plastic load-line displacements. Differences between the alternate equation and the EPRI scheme are discussed. Experimental results demonstrate the inaccuracy of the plastic hinge model and the accuracy of the power law model.

Keywords:
fracture toughness, crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD), J-integral, plastic hinge model, power law hardening

Paper ID: JTE11853J
DOI: 10.1520/JTE11853J
ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.