Comparison of the Kesternich Sulfur Dioxide Test with Industrial Atmospheric Corrosion Tests of Zinc-, Aluminum-, and Al-Zn-Coated Steel Sheet

    Volume 13, Issue 1 (January 1985)

    ISSN: 0090-3973

    CODEN: JTEOAD

    Page Count: 3


    Berke, NS
    Senior research engineer, W. R. and Co., Cambridge, MA

    Townsend, HE
    ManagerMember of ASTM, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Homer Research Laboratories, Bethlehem, PA

    Abstract

    Results of the Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) Kesternich sulfur dioxide test (DIN 50018) are compared with those of long-term industrial atmospheric exposure tests of sheet steels coated with zinc, aluminum, and Al-Zn alloy coatings. According to the Kesternich test results, Al-Zn and zinc coatings provided sacrificial protection to the steel substrate whereas the aluminum coatings did not. Durability was highest for the 55% Al-Zn and aluminum coatings. Qualitatively, these results are in good agreement with those of atmospheric tests. However, durability of 4% Al-Zn and 7% Al-Zn in the Kesternich test was better than two times greater than that provided by zinc coatings. This finding does not agree with the results of long-term atmospheric tests in an industrial environment. These comparisons demonstrate that the Kesternich test provides a useful qualitative ranking of these coatings but should not be relied on to quantitatively predict coating life.


    Paper ID: JTE10763J

    DOI: 10.1520/JTE10763J

    ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Comparison of the Kesternich Sulfur Dioxide Test with Industrial Atmospheric Corrosion Tests of Zinc-, Aluminum-, and Al-Zn-Coated Steel Sheet
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee G01