Published Online: 30 April 2010
Page Count: 15
Ohio Aerospace Institute, NASA Glenn Research Center, Brook Park, OH
Bonacuse, Peter J.
US Army Research Laboratory, NASA Glenn Research Center, Brook Park, OH
(Received 4 September 2009; accepted 22 March 2010)
Cumulative fatigue under axial and torsional loading conditions can include both load-order (high/low and low/high) as well as load-type sequence (axial/torsional and torsional/axial) effects. Previously reported experimental studies on a cobalt-base superalloy, Haynes 188 at 538°C, addressed these effects. These studies characterized the cumulative axial and torsional fatigue behavior under high amplitude followed by low amplitude (Kalluri, S. and Bonacuse, P. J., “Cumulative Axial and Torsional Fatigue: An Investigation of Load-Type Sequence Effects,” in Multiaxial Fatigue and Deformation: Testing and Prediction, ASTM STP 1387, S. Kalluri, and P. J. Bonacuse, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, 2000, pp. 281–301) and low amplitude followed by high amplitude (Bonacuse, P. and Kalluri, S. “Sequenced Axial and Torsional Cumulative Fatigue: Low Amplitude Followed by High Amplitude Loading,” Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture, ESIS Publication 31, A. Carpinteri, M. De Freitas, and A. Spagnoli, Eds., Elsevier, New York, 2003, pp. 165–182) conditions. In both studies, experiments with the following four load-type sequences were performed: (a) axial/axial, (b) torsional/torsional, (c) axial/torsional, and (d) torsional/axial. In this paper, the cumulative axial and torsional fatigue data generated in the two previous studies are combined to generate a comprehensive cumulative fatigue database on both the load-order and load-type sequence effects. This comprehensive database is used to examine applicability of the Palmgren–Langer–Miner linear damage rule and a nonlinear damage curve approach for Haynes 188 subjected to the load-order and load-type sequencing described above. Summations of life fractions from the experiments are compared to the predictions from both the linear and nonlinear cumulative fatigue damage approaches. The significance of load-order versus load-type sequence effects for axial and torsional loading conditions is discussed. Possible reasons for the observed differences between the computed and observed summations of cycle fractions are rationalized in terms of the observed evolutions of cyclic axial and shear stress ranges in the cumulative fatigue tests.
Paper ID: JAI102717