Volume 8, Issue 2 (June 1985)

    The Effect of Clay Content on Liquid Limit from a Fall Cone and the British Cup Device

    CODEN: GTJOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 5 $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    The many shortcomings of the Casagrande cup device, used almost univerally to determine the liquid limit of soils, led to the investigation of fall cones as alternatives. In two of the four types of fall cones in use, investigators have shown that the differences between fall cone liquid limit values and cup liquid limit values were not large. Evidence is produced to show that the fall cones of the same cone angle would give identical results if the appropriate depth of penetration is specified. Tests conducted using a British/French fall cone and a British cup device reveal that the difference in liquid limit values between these two devices is related to the amount of clay in the soil. A one point fall cone method is shown to be sufficiently accurate to deduce the liquid limit of soils. The fall cone method is a rational alternative to the cup device, and since engineers are interested in strength, the liquid limit could perhaps be defined as the water content at which a soil would have a specific undrained shear strength (say 1kN/m2).


    Author Information:

    Budhu, M
    Assistant professor, State University of New York at Buffalo, Engineering West, Amherst Campus, Buffalo, NY


    Stock #: GTJ10515J

    ISSN: 0149-6115

    DOI: 10.1520/GTJ10515J

    ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title The Effect of Clay Content on Liquid Limit from a Fall Cone and the British Cup Device
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee D18