SEDL / Journals / Geotechnical Testing Journal (GTJ) / Citation Page


Volume 33, Issue 6 (November 2010)

ISSN: 1945-7545
CODEN: GTJODJ
Published Online: 2 September 2010
Page Count: 10


Laboratory Performance Comparison of Stabilized Undercut Subgrade Under Cyclic Loading

Cote, Benjamin
E.I., GEI Consultants, Inc., Glastonbury, CT

Robinson, Brent
P.E., Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

Pyo, Sangchul
Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

Park, Young Jin
Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

Gabr, Mohammed
P.E., Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

Borden, Roy
P.E., Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC

(Received 22 December 2009; accepted 29 July 2010)

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of undercut subgrade stabilization measures during construction traffic loading prior to final paving. Twenty-two simulated undercut sections with different stabilization configurations over a typically undercut Coastal Plain clay subgrade were built in a large-scale test pit. The subgrade was placed at a California Bearing Ratio of ∼2–3 % and stabilized with granular layers, granular layers reinforced with geosynthetics, and lime. Granular layers consisted of either aggregate base course (ABC), sandy select fill, or a multi-layer system with both soil types. The four geosynthetics tested were a woven reinforcement geotextile, a woven separation geotextile, and two biaxial polypropylene geogrids. The soft nature of the subgrade and its consequences on the ability to compact the ABC layer show the importance of carefully analyzing the results when viewed on a comparative basis. Cyclic plate loading simulating construction traffic showed that thicker granular layers produced less surface displacement, barring subgrade strength differences from remolding effects. Tests with lime stabilized subgrade showed the least magnitude of deformation over initial and post-rut repair cycles. ABC tests with geotextile showed improvement over unreinforced sections but only when placed at depths approximately equal to the loading plate diameter and after initial displacements mobilized the geosynthetic strength.



Keywords:
cyclic plate load tests, geosynthetics, lime, subgrade, unpaved roads

Paper ID: GTJ102935
DOI: 10.1520/GTJ102935
ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

Author Title Laboratory Performance Comparison of Stabilized Undercut Subgrade Under Cyclic Loading Symposium , 0000-00-00 Committee D18