You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

(Received 15 February 2007; accepted 25 November 2008)

**Published Online: **2009

**CODEN:** GTJOAD

Format |
Pages |
Price |
||

8 | $25 | ADD TO CART |

Pressure transducers are frequently used to monitor slug tests, and to collect a data set for height *Z* of water column versus time *t*. Direct application of the data to draw a velocity graph usually produces a wide scatter, thus limiting the usefulness of the velocity graph method. This paper proposes to interpret the data set in five steps. First, a *Z*(*t*) plot is drawn to assess the uncertainty in the *Z* data. Second, a limited number of data points are selected to reduce the uncertainty to about ±10 % in the velocity graph. Third, the velocity graph is drawn to obtain the hydraulic conductivity *k* and the piezometric error *H*_{0}, if any, giving the piezometric level for the test. Fourth, the graph of ln(*Z*−*H*_{0}) versus *t* is drawn to verify its linearity and check the *k* value of the velocity graph. Fifth, the graph of *Z* versus log_{10}(*t*) can be used in a curve fitting process to yield directly both *H*_{0} and *k*, thus providing a second method to interpret the data set, which may be the only one possible when the *Z*(*t*) data are inaccurate. Examples are provided to illustrate the five steps and common problems.

**Author Information:**

Chapuis, Robert P.*École Polytechnique de Montréal, *

**Stock #:** GTJ101058

**ISSN:** 0149-6115

**DOI:** 10.1520/GTJ101058

ASTM International is a member of CrossRef.

AuthorTitle Interpreting Slug Tests with Large Data Sets

Symposium , 0000-00-00

Committee D18