Volume 50, Issue 5 (September 2005)

    Ten Years After Daubert: The Status of the States

    (Received 13 June 2004; accepted 26 March 2005)

    Published Online: July

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 10 $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    This paper examines how many of the states have changed their respective scientific-evidence admissibility standards under the influence of the United States Supreme Court's 1993 Daubert decision. The authors offer a definition of what constitutes a Daubert state, and using this definition classify the fifty states into three categories. These are: Frye states (15 states, 10 with codified evidence rules patterned after the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE)); Daubert states (26 states, 24 with FRE-based rules), and non-Frye/non-Daubert states (9 states, 7 with FRE-based rules). The authors discuss how the reliability requirement varies among the non-Frye states, and examine how particular types of evidence have fared in the Daubert era. Finally, the authors offer some predictions for the scientific evidence trends of the states.


    Author Information:

    Keierleber, JA
    MTC Forensics, Peaks Island, ME

    Bohan, TL
    MTC Forensics, Peaks Island, ME


    Stock #: JFS2004241

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS2004241

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Ten Years After Daubert: The Status of the States
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30