Volume 48, Issue 5 (September 2003)

    Author's Response

    Published Online: September

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    The following is a response to the commentaries by Drs. Coldiron (J. Forensic Sci 2003;48:271) and Coleman and Lawrence (J. Forensic Sci 2003;48:697): Our dermatological colleagues should recognize that there are semantic differences between “tumescent liposuction,” “tumescent anesthesia,” and tumescent technique” as used by the broad array of clinicians. Concurrent use of general or intramuscular anesthesia has been used by some of our surgical colleagues (1–3). In our article, we used the term “tumescent liposuction” in reference to the fact that a bolus of fluid and medication is inserted into the surgical site. Hanke and Coleman (4) speak of “semitumescent liposuction” when general anesthesia is used. Webster’s dictionary describes “tumescent” as a swelling. Thus, to us, the term “tumescent liposuction” is a generic concept. We prefer that our dermatological colleagues use the term “tumescent techniques as described by Klein” (5) so that any ambiguity can be avoided.


    Stock #: JFS2003123

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS2003123

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Author's Response
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30