Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.

    Volume 48, Issue 5 (September 2003)

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    CODEN: JFSOAD

    Published Online: 1 September 2003

    Page Count: 1


    Abstract

    I read with alarm the discussion by Thompson et al., of the significance of DNA evidence in forensic casework. I was struck by the authors' description of a 1995 case in the jurisdiction in which I practice law. The authors state: "In 1995, Cellmark Diagnostics admitted that a similar sample-switch error had caused it to report, incorrectly, that a rape defendant's DNA profile matched DNA found in vaginal aspirate from a rape victim."


    Paper ID: JFS2003059

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS2003059

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Commentary on: Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence. J Forensic Sci 2003;48(1):47-54.
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30